Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - sevinkimpson

Pages: 1 2 [3]
21
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR Speed
« on: June 05, 2008, 11:03:58 PM »
As per re-reading, one way that I can avoid this is to try to form a mental image of what the stimulus is saying, and to get a concrete grasp of the conclusion and the supporting evidence. If some specific detail has escaped me that is key to the solution, then it's ok to re-read that part- and if I read it well the first time then I at least know right where to look for it. But in general, try bringing the stimulus out of the abstractness of language and get a good grip on what it's saying.

22
Why are a few people saying that the June test is going to be the hardest ever?

23
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Shift in LSAT difficulty
« on: June 04, 2008, 01:51:46 AM »
Bah- that's sort of what I feared. Is there any way to counter that without actually buying each of the most recent prep tests individually (beside just lowering expectations)?

24
Studying for the LSAT / Shift in LSAT difficulty
« on: June 04, 2008, 01:47:03 AM »
In preparing for the June test, I began by completing the original 10 actual official LSATs book, and will now lead up to test day with the tests from 10 more actual official LSATs. I have read in several places that the logic games of the mid 90s are more difficult than those currently used.

1) How much truth is there to this, and to what extent will the tests that I have been practicing with affect my June LG performance?

2) Is there a shift in the other sections as well? Does a solid LR and RC performance tests in the 90s mean good things for this year?

I just don't want to be blindsided and perform lower than my expectations because I am taking the wrong tests. Any feedback would be appreciated.

Pages: 1 2 [3]