Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - trustno1

Pages: [1]
out of curiousity, are any of you a minority?

Current Law Students / Re: law school for late bloomers
« on: May 29, 2008, 07:41:34 PM »
Law school should not be a way out just because your current career is boring.  Practicing law itself is BORING.  It's not glamorous for the most part.  Instead, I think the attorneys who really get are satisfied with their jobs are those who either pursue a CAUSE they are interested in or are simply interested and passionate about the law and how it develops.

Many attorneys have neither, and there are those that just plod along (and probably would describe their job as you described yours), or those who actively hate it.

I agree. perhaps I should've worded that differently. practicing law appeals to me because I like the idea of helping others, or making a difference in someone's life. but, people do change. I've talked to people that were passionate about law when they first became lawyers but just like any other job it slowly started to wear them down. I guess it's all a state of mind.

Current Law Students / law school for late bloomers
« on: May 29, 2008, 06:04:41 PM »
ok, i'm 36, still have no frakkin' clue what I want to do with my life and law school seems like my way out of a monotonous and unsatisfying work life. is there anyone else here who is slightly older than the average law school student, let's say over 30, who has some insightful advice they want to offer?

- were the lsat's difficult for you?

- how do you juggle work with school? especially if you have a family.

- are your job prospects everything you've hoped for?

- are you satisfied with your choice to attend law school?

- was it hard securing financial aid?

I've tried viewing affirmative action from both sides of the aisle but it's hard to come to a consensus, especially when race does play a significant role in our lives. On the one hand, AA is helpful to minorities in that it levels the playing field and gives opportunity where none existed. On the other hand, it undermines the merit system by which students work so hard to gain entry into good schools.

I can't help but think of the Presidential race and the noticeable labeling of Barack Obama as a "black man" when he is clearly of bi-racial ancestry. Has he or anyone of bi-racial descent benefited from AA? The reason I bring this up is that i'm bi-racial (half caucasian, half japanese) and I frequently wonder if AA could help me academically if I needed it? I'd hate to think I would need to resort to AA to gain entry into any school but I've found that my identity has at times hindered my ability to achieve the things I want to achieve. When people look at me there's slight confusion as to what I am -- am I white? am I Asian? no, i'm both but I don't fit the stereotypical mold of what a bi-racial asian/caucasian individual is supposed to look like. my eyes are almond shaped, I have curly hair and I don't look remotely Japanese. So I guess my answer to anyone who questions my bi-racial identity would be that unless you've had to fill out the "other" box on a job application or have had racial epithets hurled at you then you have no right to claim what my ethnicity is.

Enough of my little diatribe...back to the point of my post. Do you think bi-racial individuals should benefit from AA or are we to be treated as non-minorities? When filling out an application of any kind is it wrong to claim you're something other than caucasian....or black.....or asian if your other half is a stark contrast? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on the matter.

Pages: [1]