Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - POTUS20

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
31
General Board / Re: 2009 USnews Rankings
« on: March 27, 2008, 02:17:36 PM »
Ok, well my high school has put more people into the NFL than any other high school ever. So obviously I win all of these arguments.

Obviously.

32
General Board / Re: 2009 USnews Rankings
« on: March 27, 2008, 02:11:13 PM »
nothing cures an inferiority complex better than a $3100 / week paycheck....

Oh jesus, you too?  The first rule of defending 2Lman is never defend 2Lman.

33
General Board / Re: 2009 USnews Rankings
« on: March 27, 2008, 12:31:36 PM »
Agreed.

34
General Board / Re: 2009 USnews Rankings
« on: March 27, 2008, 11:50:31 AM »
That's entirely untrue.  GW places all over the major markets in the US whether you want to admit it or not.  Now go back to your regional TTT and cry about your unpaid internship rejections.

sigh, placing top 10% in major markets isn't national. Go back to bragging about BIGLAW.

Here, here.  2Lman, take the hint.  You are an A-Hole and nobody likes you.  As I said before, you don't represent your school well. 

35
General Board / Re: 2009 USnews Rankings
« on: March 27, 2008, 10:09:32 AM »
I only mention it when ppl. make it seem like I"m some bum that doesn't have a job nor know what he is talking about. 

POTUS, you are an idiot.  A minute ago you talked trash that I went to GW, now it's a "respectable institution."

Moron.

I did not trash GW.  I just pointed out the fact that some GW students have an inferiority complex because GULC outranks GW.  No contradiction, my brother.  GW is a fine school.  Unfortunately, you continue to be an A*hole. 


36
General Board / Re: 2009 USnews Rankings
« on: March 27, 2008, 09:15:38 AM »
Haha, OK.  You DO mention that SA gig a lot...

Thanks, Peaches.  I appreciate the support.

37
General Board / Re: 2009 USnews Rankings
« on: March 27, 2008, 09:15:00 AM »
It seems pretty accurate.  I doubt a spoof would be that close.  Though I agree, I think that we shoulda been 18 or 19, but what can ya do?  It really doesn't make much sense, but then again, they take into account library volumes, which is just ridiculous.

So I'm guessing GW, 2Lman?

I love folks like you that make up special screen names to talk trash b/c they are too chicken *&^% to do it on their own name.


Are you kidding me with this?  Is your real name 2Lman?  GW must be proud - it's a shame that people like you represent a respectable institution.  Have a nice day, D bag.



38
General Board / Re: 2009 USnews Rankings
« on: March 27, 2008, 08:02:00 AM »
Interesting.  No wonder you have an inferiority complex. 

39
General Board / Re: 2009 USnews Rankings
« on: March 27, 2008, 07:43:44 AM »
It seems pretty accurate.  I doubt a spoof would be that close.  Though I agree, I think that we shoulda been 18 or 19, but what can ya do?  It really doesn't make much sense, but then again, they take into account library volumes, which is just ridiculous.

So I'm guessing GW, 2Lman?

40
Studying and Exam Taking / Re: law review write on competition
« on: March 26, 2008, 10:01:07 PM »
did you really get into law school with logic like that?

violating rules? its called asking for ways to prepare.  It is no more cheating than anyone else asking how to prepare for the lsat, for exams, etc.  Heck, people on this board routinely help each other *write* cover letters, application essays, etc.  Yet you want to get on my case for asking how to *prepare* for the competition?

get a grip.

My guess is a)I attend a more respected law school than you do, and b)I have a biglaw gig lined up, what about you?  My guess is no or you wouldn't be worrying about journal competition.....

Funny how you question how I got into law school based on my calling you out.  Meanwhile my "logic" performance on the LSAT probably blew yours away jerk off.

I haven't been posting on here for long, but it's painfully obvious that 2Lman is a real feminine hygiene product bag.  Oh hey, is it true you got a biglaw job?  Nobody gives an F.  2Lman, I have an announcement: You are what people hate about lawyers.  Do the rest of us a favor and stop being a prick.  Thank you.


Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5