I'm just curious:
A) Why do you keep slapping pics of sleazy porn-starish women all over this site?
B) What do breast implants have to do with "the female form"?
I think you confuse objectification with appreciation. What you seem to "appreciate" is the standard of "beauty" celebrated by frat boys and 15-year olds.
A) There is nothing sleazy about pornography. It is in fact a very lucrative and highly respectable trade. Lawyers are an especially integral part of the adult entertainment industry. I post pictures of beautiful women in threads where I believe their introduction is appropriate. While I would love to post pictures of nude women so that we could all appreciate their form, I don't wish to break any forum rules. To this extent, I provide the suggestion of sexuality where a more explicit portrayal might better place my point in context. I apologize if this has caused any confusion.
B) Much as the Greeks idealized their human sculptures to establish certain standards of masculine beauty, so also today do we use surgeons (as well as makeup artists, lighting experts, computer programmers, anthropologists, etc.) to develop certain standards of feminine beauty. While larger breasts do not scientifcally correlate to more nourishment, aesthetically they do provide such a suggestion, much in the same way that a large waist to hip ratio is suggestive of a woman's womb space. In both these cases, the anatomical preferences are strongly intertwined with sexuality, which is the root of all beauty.
Finally, like Ruskin, I believe that art, even if it is somewhat crude, does a hold a place for even the unformed masses. Therefore, your attempted aspersions on the artistic sensibilities of "frat boys" and adolescent males really seems to me quite irrelevant.