« on: September 11, 2005, 11:41:36 AM »
well...briefly, b/c i have a TON of my own work to do...this might get you started...
you could argue that the P could "forsee" that by vigorously shaking a champagne bottle, the cork would fly out like a bullet. a reasonable person would assume that shaking a champagne bottle is not the smartest thing to do. on the other hand, while the P may have forseen that the champagne cork may have flewn off, it was NOT forseeable that two people would have been killed by a champagne cork. the reasonable person would not forsee a cork killing two people.
like i said..this is just a start. a real exam would require much more detail and more arguments. good luck!!