Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - dft

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52
491
Studying and Exam Taking / Re: How many hours a day do you study?
« on: February 28, 2005, 07:05:21 PM »
Yea - me too (I'm assuming you're serious).  In fact, I just bought his book on Amazon - it was pretty inexpensive too.

Generally speaking, law students are rather bright individuals.  Many law students can “get by” or even do “well” with a minimal amount of studying (“minimal” being a relative term). 

However, if you view law school as the beginning of your career as a lawyer, are you willing to settle for “getting by?”  I encourage students to perform at their personal best levels, preparing for the days when they will be representing clients whose freedom, lives, fortunes and families may well be at stake.  Start practicing now to be the kind of lawyer you would hire if you needed a lawyer. 

So how does this translate into time spent studying?  Devote as much time to law now as you will when you enter the professional practice.  A light week for an attorney is in the neighborhood of sixty hours.

Consider this:  14 hours in class; 42 hours outside of class (3 hours for every class hour). That adds up to 56 hours – one-third of the 168 hours we all have in each week.  If you sleep as much as 8 hours each night (7 X 8 = 56), that leaves you with 56 hours to attend to your personal health and well being, to socialize, to shop, to wash the car, shampoo the puppy and do all those other things that make life worthwhile.

If you spend substantially more time than this, you run the risk of burning out, ruining your health, giving in to the stresses we all (lawyers and law students) face, and – therefore – doing less than your personal best. 

If you spend substantially less time than this, you probably won’t be attending to all the essential elements of high-level study and exam prep: reading, briefing, attending every class, taking notes, transforming your notes, creating course summaries (“outlines”), developing flow charts, and answering practice hypotheticals in writing.

For an in-depth discussion of how much time to spend studying, and how to use that time most efficiently, go to your law library and find the September issue of Student Lawyer, the ABA Law Student Division publication.  The cover article I wrote covers this whole topic, and provides a step-by-step method for allocating your time.  There you will find a sample of how a student can determine precisely how much time to spend studying each day.

If you have further questions about this, feel free to e-mail me.


I really love this guy.

492
General Board / Re: Dating while in law school
« on: February 21, 2005, 01:38:47 PM »
Pimpin'.     ;)

I would forsee a problem hanging around the undergrad girls because, in my experience, they  tend to be immature and less intelligent than grad school girls. They also have different priorites (i.e. dating the popular frat boy instead of dating the guy who's gonna end up having a lucrative career). Oh well...

This is absolutely correct. This is why its important to limit your exposure to the undergrads.  Remember, they're on your agenda, not the other way around.  Let them date the popular frat boy if they want to, that's their problem.

493
Bump for unreads.

494
General Board / Re: PLS comments from current students please :o)
« on: February 20, 2005, 12:43:55 PM »
Thanks - that was helpful.

Well, I didn't use the PLS study method, but I generally do endorse it, and in fact am a member of the PLS Yahoo! group. Now, the obvious question is, 'How can you say it works if you haven't actually used it?'

Well, basically, I agree with PLS that there is very little instruction that goes on in law school. The fact of the matter is that law students pay exorbitant amounts of money to teach themselves the law. Yes, you WILL be teaching yourself the law/legal reasoning, so you may as well get used to it now. Personally, I used a combo of the PLS/LSC approach. What I did/do is read a hornbook and/or commercial outiline section before I do my casebook reading. IMHO, the Aspen E&E's are generally excellent for the first year courses, with the exception of Property (useless) and K's (OK, but not great). I do/did not outline, and generally cut class often (thought this depends on the course).

Why struggle through the material during the first couple of months? Do the PLS study method (if you have the time) and start off WAY ahead of your classmates. Sure, many of them will learn the material as well, but you can use the time you saved to do hypos/practice legal reasoning, actually go to class (this may or may not be helpful), do CALI lessons, and/or relax.

One piece of advice. If you DO use PLS, don't answer questions in class even though you know the answers. And, if you think/do know the answer, don't let your prof or your classmates try to mislead you. You'll see what I mean when you go to class.

I have yet to get all my grades, but so far I got an A- in Crim Law and am generally doing well in legal writing. Still waiting on torts, though...

495
General Board / Your opinion of the best audio preparation for law school
« on: February 16, 2005, 08:44:11 PM »
**I meant PMBR above, not BarBri (I don't think I can change it now).  I don't think BarBri offers CDs**

I probably going to be attending law school next year (if not, then the following year) and I have been looking for a productive way to spend my car rides (I drive a lot).  I know a lot of law students say it's unnecessary to prepare for law school prior to starting but it's just something to pass the time when I get sick of the same old music.

I'm considering buying at least one of the Sum and Substance CD's (Torts or Con. Law, maybe?).  I recently heard PMBR is good too though (the ones you use to prepare for the Bar Exam).

If anyone has experience with the aforementioned materials, please elaborate.

496
General Board / Re: Law Review or Moot Court
« on: February 02, 2005, 11:39:12 PM »
Moot court, I can attest to personally, doesn't do a whole lot for the job hunt.  Neither will it help with courtroom skills--that would be trial team, unless you are in the 0.0001% of attorneys who argues before an appellate court.


So - Moot Court won't help you with your courtroom skills?  What's "trial team"?  I've never heard of it.  Do most law schools have it?

497
General Board / Re: Is Roger Williams LS a scam?
« on: February 02, 2005, 11:37:10 PM »
I skimmed that article briefly and didn't see Roger Williams mentioned in it once.

498
I think it's kind of important too.  1L is the most important year.  Now, if there is, in fact, essentially nothing you can do to help prepare yourself for law school prior to entering 1L, then that's another story...

499
General Board / Re: Low LSAT, doing well in law school?
« on: February 02, 2005, 11:21:55 PM »
Are there any 1Ls or even 2Ls out there who scored low on the LSAT but are still doing well in school?

Great question!

500
General Board / Re: Law Review or Moot Court
« on: February 01, 2005, 07:28:25 PM »
Law review is a good ticket.  It's a simple way that employers know 1) you're in the relative top of your class;

Wouldn't that be obvious from your class rank?

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52