Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Burning Sands

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 22
81
General Board / Re: Social life in law school
« on: April 26, 2005, 01:40:05 AM »
Awww, thanks, Kelly.

Sands - there's too much bull and drama there for me.  Please tell your boy HBCU to keep me out of y'all's *&^% over there.

it ain't him as much as its those other wack cats on there. there are a lot who are still positive but I think you let some of the negative cats get to you, namely the females.  I need another voice of reason

82
General Board / Re: Con Law anybody?
« on: April 26, 2005, 01:29:46 AM »
LOL

Well good luck to everybody taking the Con Law final.  Hopefully if anybody makes any major breakthroughs that would be beneficial for the final we can post them here, or at the very least hash out some issues.

later

83
General Board / Con Law anybody?
« on: April 24, 2005, 08:01:25 PM »
So...1000 concurring and dissenting supreme court opinions later here we are at Finals and I'm still not sure what at the hype is around the "trigger stage" of analysis.  Somebody give me a rational basis for this class b/c its not passing the strict scrutiny test.

How's everybody else finding it?

84
General Board / Re: Social life in law school
« on: April 24, 2005, 07:21:57 PM »
Ruskie where you been hiding??  I need you over on the BLSD, its all going to sh!t over there.

85
General Board / Re: Advice for New Law Students
« on: April 24, 2005, 07:18:21 PM »
I don't know about the rest of you, but every now and again I have to come up for air, take a look around and realize "wow, I'm a law student."

86
General Board / Re: What is the black letter rules?
« on: April 24, 2005, 07:12:53 PM »
One doesn't really like or dislike black letter law...it is the law. 


LOL!!!!

Tell me about it.

87
General Board / DAMN APPELLATE BRIEF
« on: March 28, 2005, 11:16:06 AM »
Mulitple all nighters, and its finally over.  It might be good, it might be bad, but it's done and at this point that's all that matters.


88
General Board / Re: March Madness
« on: March 18, 2005, 10:46:30 AM »
DAMN PITT!!!!

89
Not sure what you mean when you say that academically both schools are a "push", but I'll see ya in the fall.

90
General Board / Re: Contracts Question
« on: March 14, 2005, 01:40:00 AM »
Jen - I concur with what Coregram said.  The UCC example is a good illustration of how partial performance can negate the need to have a K in writing.  However pay attention to the part where he says if you work for 2 years on an oral agreement, and get fired, all you have proven is the agreement for 2 years, even if it was supposed to be for 5.  This is Quantum Meruit.  See Britton v. Turner 6 N.H. 481.

You asked about reliance or restitution damages for the guy who gets fired before his K is up.  Here's the tricky part.  Reliance or Restitution would theoretically make sense because you can argue that the guy relied on the 5 year K to his detriment and blah blah blah.  However, be careful with that.  What a lot of law school students fail to realize is that employment K's (whether Oral or Written) are at-will employment K's.  Meaning, a company has a legal entitlement to fire the employee (technically breaching the K) at any time without consequence, so long as they have paid the employee up until that time of termination.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 22