|
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - uni-brow
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 30
1
« on: November 28, 2006, 01:23:56 AM »
I'm getting anxious because I have 2 tests that I planned to take this week and I want to take them. However, I need to review concepts and strategy, which will take about a day. Is it best to save the tests until after I've done the review or take the tests and review those tests plus the concepts? Please add your input and reasoning. Happy studying to all!
2
« on: November 28, 2006, 12:17:53 AM »
Oh man, thank you for mentioning LSAC being overly PC! It needed to be said.
3
« on: November 28, 2006, 12:15:12 AM »
Way to be! I'm kinda not caring what I get anymore as well, but I still am going to study this week.
4
« on: November 28, 2006, 12:11:36 AM »
I can't reliably complete every LR section, although I try to everytime. I'm always within the skipping 0-3 range, and I'm really bothered when I fall short on time, especially because I'm good at PR and those are the ones I skip due to the time crunch. I think generally the first 10 questions are straightforward and there's rarely any tricky answers. Therefore, if I find my prephase and/or am super confident that a certain choice is the correct answer, can I just move on? I have been going through all the answer choices, but I find that if the question is really easy, or I'm positive a certain choice is the correct answer my mind just shuts down with the remaining choices and it's practically wasted time.
5
« on: November 27, 2006, 11:43:05 PM »
LOL! I hope you won't drink? it on test day!
6
« on: November 27, 2006, 11:22:58 PM »
I actually have the same plan as you. 2 tests during the last five days. Um, I'm planning on taking mine Wednesday and Thursday because Friday is my day of rest  You're making me think about switching to tomorrow and Thursday. Anyone have any input especially because I have a pretty good chunk of material to review?
7
« on: November 26, 2006, 11:50:22 PM »
In dealing with questions that ask why an author has included a particular statement, does the statement need to be understood in relation to the entire paragraph that the statement appeared in?
8
« on: November 25, 2006, 01:57:02 AM »
Test 25, Section 4, Question 23.
Only computer scientists understand the architecture of personal computers, and only those who understand the architecture of personal computers appreciate the advances of technology made in the last decade. It follows that only those who appreciate these advances are computer scientists.
Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the reasoning in the argument?
(B) The argument ignores the fact that some computer scientists may not appreciate the advances in technology in the last decade.
(B) is the correct choice, but is the flaw a mistaken reversal? I diagrammed it, and that's what I came up with.
9
« on: November 24, 2006, 02:22:59 AM »
Really, they're not that tough. They merely are different than standard linear, grouping games etc. Stay calm, and think of a logical setup or just use the rules to knock off wrong answers.
10
« on: November 24, 2006, 02:18:00 AM »
Alright, so unless otherwise defined, adjacent = directly next to; left or right.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 30
|