I'm just bitter because whenever I pop in here, I don't recognize anybody anymore. Who are you people?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Catwoman
I kind of like it as-is. Its an "outside of the box" addendum, showcases great writing skills, and makes you look good in spite of your probation offenses. I say keep it or maybe find a way to edit it down a bit without losing its overall feel and flavor.
I liked it too! I was wondering why I was the only one. It can be trimmed a little bit, but I wouldn't butcher it too badly. To be honest, I don't know a lot about what is required/expected in an addendum, but I thought this was a good piece of writing.
« on: November 15, 2007, 04:24:30 PM »
There was actually a thread discussing this question not that long ago...
Yeah I get it now I had forgotten how to logically negate conditional statements. Thanks for the explanation Jeffort.
And thanks, too, to GCoop for his half-assed attempt at an explanation, right?
Which one of the following would, if true, most strengthen the claim made by the author in the last sentence of the passage (lines 54-58)?
Looks like erick2naive doesn't always follow his own advice. Here he only posted two answer choices.
OP--kits44, that is--READ MY POST ABOUT POSTING ALL 5 CHOICES and NOT MAKING CLEAR WHICH ANSWER IS TCR.
Oh please. It is his question; it's his perogative whether or not he wants to list all five answer choices.
« on: November 04, 2007, 02:18:44 PM »
You should design a course that avoids all that pesky "formal relationship between assumption and conclusion" stuff.