IMO law book salesmen, bar exam failures, questionable Nigerian attorneys and disbarred attorneys are the only ones who routinely use the JD suffix. So I don't see why a Novus graduate couldn't use the title.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - jonlevy
« on: March 07, 2015, 07:31:40 PM »
Taft and others have a proven track record. Don't go with a DL school that has no attorney alumni. You can verify their claims by checking the Cal Bar pass rates. And if you do not want to travel to California to take the exams, this is not for you. Finally do you have the time - figure 20 hours a week minimum for the next 4 or 5 years. DL success is time intensive because it depends on rote memory and essays. If you are outside California, you will be limited to federal practice - Immigration, Tax, Veterans Disability, Social Security and a few other esoteric fields. Insurance is a good background for Social Security Disability, Veterans Disability. The latter two fields have training and seminars available through professional orgs like NOSSCR.
« on: March 05, 2015, 07:41:42 PM »
TJS is giving the impression falsely that its LLM is accredited by the ABA. In fact the ABA's only interest is that the non JD program do not have an adverse impact on the JD program:
"The ABA reviews these degree programs only to determine whether their offering would have an adverse impact on the law school's ability to maintain its accreditation for the JD program. If no adverse impact is indicated, the ABA "acquiesces" in the law school's decision to offer the non-JD program and degree."
« on: March 03, 2015, 07:20:27 PM »
FYI - ABA only accredits law schools. All Masters in Legal Studies (MLS) and EJDs if accredited would be regionally accredited. A lot of LLMs like those in Tax would be geared towards attorneys. I'm not a fan of non attorney JDs. It is like going to medical school and not becoming a doctor. It also creates a problem because people will assume you are an attorney and can create inadvertent UPL issues.
« on: February 28, 2015, 02:30:11 PM »
I would opt for a non bar track degree as you will save 1-2 years of school versus 4 for the JD.
« on: February 28, 2015, 02:27:33 PM »
In my book regional accreditation would be key. Concord offers an accredited EJD and Small Business LLM:
Another option is an accredited MLS - Masters in Legal Studies like this one:
Most distance learning law schools are not regionally accredited, at best they are just registered with the California Bar.
« on: February 02, 2015, 07:13:25 AM »
Better than wasting money on NOVUS and given it is an Irish certificate one can claim some facility with common and EU law. All in all, might be worth it for anyone with a little time. Might consideer it myself as a CLE.
Distance Education Law Schools / Re: Has any online laws schools lately applied for ABA accreditation?« on: January 05, 2015, 07:30:07 AM »
It is a Catch 22 - online schools as such cannot provide the infrastructure or staffing to meet ABA requirements; they also attract a lot of students who are either lacking skills or commitment to make distance learning work. Distance learning may work for the highly motivated student or someone already working in the courts or law but for the average student the outcome is doubtful. However, with continuing improvement in technology; I think DL will eventually occupy the field. But the ABA and state bars are ruled by dinosaurs - the bricks and mortar law firm will be endangered long before they ever get around to tinkering seriously with law schools. Case in point - 50+ separate bars in the USA in an increasingly digitized and standardized world. ULP laws are so confusing many attorneys just ignore them.