BU no question.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - transferguy
Pages:  2
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: MP's Thread, or how to get paid $75K to sit around: also known as UChicago 2010« on: July 24, 2009, 06:20:39 PM »
Thanks for answering! I thought that was how it worked, but I just wanted to make sure.
So this now spawns another question. Let's say I want to work in Boston (or some other smaller secondary market) where, according to the "Who Worked Where" spreadsheet, not very many UChicago students worked. Would it be wasting my bids to put Boston firms within my top 10 bids if so few UChicago students end up working there? Would it be advisable to place major market firms within my top 10 and place the secondary market firms lower down on my bid list because chances are few students are bidding on them?
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: MP's Thread, or how to get paid $75K to sit around: also known as UChicago 2010« on: July 24, 2009, 05:47:38 PM »
I just wanted to clarify something real quick. Does the order/rank of your bids have any effect on the likelihood of landing an interview? (i.e. does putting a firm as my #1 bid increase my chance at getting an interview as compared to putting it as #50? Or does the order mean nothing?)
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: MP's Thread, or how to get paid $75K to sit around: also known as UChicago 2« on: July 23, 2009, 03:25:02 PM »
it makes sense to me that there could be some Illini boys at Chicago (especially if one were a transfer
<----- Illinois undergrad alumnus and now a UChicago transfer!
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: UChicago Class of 2010: "Limping Towards the Finish Line Bruised and Battered"« on: July 16, 2009, 12:50:59 AM »
Agreed. I don't care too much where I end up, and it's pretty silly of them to expect anything more than brutal honesty when we a) haven't practiced law b) all firms work with the same big corporations and have similar practice areas (e.g., lit, real estate, IP) and c) the information isn't out there for us to make informed decisions, anyway.
How good or bad would it be to say something along the lines of "I'm not going to pretend like I have an intimate knowledge of the inner working of practice at X firm, but I do have a general preference towards X type of law"? I basically don't want to come in and regurgitate a bunch of information that I read that I really do not comprehend because that just sounds really fake and mechanical and they'll probably think I'm a d-bag. At the same time, I don't want to come off as if I hadn't done some homework on the firm. It's a fine line.
« on: June 29, 2009, 01:21:54 PM »
You need to chillax lalaland.
I don't think saying chill out was being rude and certainly doesn't warrant calling me a feminine hygiene product. Pot calling the kettle black, much?
« on: June 29, 2009, 12:37:18 PM »
Maybe people just aren't waiting for Stanford cause they knew their chances were slim anyway. I didn't apply either.
Ya, this. I applied, but as they take like 12 people, I'm not really caring that much about the application at the moment. You need to chillax lalaland.
It happens all the time. It is also not uncommon for people to miss changing the name of the school somewhere in it so don't stress too much about it, a few typos should not make or break you.
I don't understand why these mistakes are acceptable for regular applications but not for transfer apps.
Pages:  2