« on: March 22, 2009, 01:54:42 PM »
Messages - Craving Oyer
« on: December 21, 2008, 10:38:12 AM »
Couple threads on another discussion board seem to lend some credence to a December 23rd release. We'll see...
« on: December 21, 2008, 10:37:16 AM »
I've lived through 4 catastrophic illnesses, the murder of two friends, and an armed invasion of my workplace by a knife-wielding assailant who stabbed someone in front of me, therefore I will not be too affected by my LSAT score when I receive it.
Damn. At least you drive a Jeep.
« on: November 30, 2008, 02:33:11 PM »
I don't have the book on me but it would guess the stimulus goes something like this.....if someone does X, then they deserve punishment. They concluded from this that because someone is punished, they must have done X.
Thanks, that explains it!
« on: November 30, 2008, 11:06:48 AM »
So I'm reading the LR Bible and this potential answer choice for mistakes in reversal makes no sense to me:
"Mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it." (page 376)
Does that make any sense to anyone else?
I've been studying pretty regularly for about 6 weeks now. I plan to take a practice test a day (except Thursday, my day off), two on Saturday, and on Sunday I have my LSAT review class. Otherwise, I'll use my time to review incorrect answers, and study weak areas in the Bibles.
Thanks, Earlcat. That makes sense. I'll still get through the preptests timed, but I'll use some of the pre-2000 LSATS to break up and just sit for an hour and work through a section slowly focusing on the logic.