Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - arc87

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
Minority and Non-Traditional Law Students / Felony and what it means
« on: January 21, 2005, 11:53:02 AM »
I have been on these boards for quite a while.  Many of you know that I had a felony and was facing a very tough time in gaining entrance to law school.

I ended up with a 172 on the LSAt and 4.0 since returning to school

So far I have not been denied anywhere
Rutgers (offered 30K)
Tulane (offered 60K)

I truly believe that a top 15 will let me in.  Many told me that a felon could not make it in law, well I am proof that if you turn your life around our country will give you a second chance.


Studying for the LSAT / Question about yawning
« on: January 10, 2005, 06:42:03 PM »
anyone know where the yawning question comes from, which test?

something like the majority believes that seeing someone  yawn is the main reason that we yawn.  if we believe popular historians of the past they say its true.  Thus, this is the reason why we yawn

the argument is vulnerable to criticism because....

Choosing the Right Law School / Which Schools count the second score
« on: December 24, 2004, 01:19:08 PM »
I scored a 172 on the DEC LSAT - which top universities disregard a substantially lower score?

Im thinking the last question would be wrong but not sure about the rest.

If w then s then u

should have been if u then s then w

Studying for the LSAT / Felony -
« on: December 13, 2004, 01:42:46 PM »
Today I found out that I was charged with a felony but convicted of a misdemeanor.  In my apps I said I recieved a deferred ajudication termed dangerous drugs.  My charge was the possession of two ounces of marijuana. 

Quesion is - should I send an updated addendum to law schools.  Thankfully I never said that this was a felony - I left it open-ended.  I said it was a deferred ajudication.  Problem that I have is that  a commity could read so much different stuff into that.  Then again if I submit an updated addendum - this makes me looks squirrely.  Any advice?

Studying for the LSAT / hey this is arc87
« on: December 10, 2004, 08:55:02 PM »
few words here, my name is Tommy Sober.

There are so many here that are cool, its time for me to prop you.

AJ - many thanks for your help and your attitude, and your love for the music.

Casca- your strong, I submitted questions that confused me - you and AJ were there.  I am honest and very strong at this test - great many thanks for both of your's intellect.

Franz- very powerful, although you didn't have mucvh time your words were great.

Matt- first interaction not cool at all - you now are one that I consider very cool

I would call all of you bros at any time -

if at any time I could help you with anything let me know arc87 @

AJ - band of gypsies take a look if you haven't

Kateie your candor on the net is impressive

hocifene -  your cool havent seem you here but hope you come back

I am strong at this test, perhaps I never put the time in to show it.  All of you helped me big - I am a double felon coming back - thanks to you guys It might push me over th top.

Mrs Malaprop many thanks for your writing help
Rando - you took way too much time thanks again

Draino - your observations of my writing were baffling and correct.

I call all of you my family, you need anything from me

For those that I didn't mention, I love you your my bro.


arc87, Tommy Sober

Studying for the LSAT / The LR we cannot remember
« on: December 08, 2004, 09:45:59 AM »
Are these easy questions?  Im hoping the answer is yes, easy ones don't seem to stick in our heads.

Im still pissed that nobody can remember the "the conclusion follows logically if question"  it was on the 26 question one.

Studying for the LSAT / Last section of reading comp
« on: December 05, 2004, 03:36:00 PM »
Can you tell me the FINAL answer to the reading comp section.  I think I chose B on it.

Studying for the LSAT / Following logically if question
« on: December 05, 2004, 12:45:21 PM »
I cannot remmeber the question in detail.  It was on the one with 27 questions between 20-27, very difficult for me to make sense of.

I chose the answer as AJ had instructed.  It was the only answer choice one that had a piece of the conditional reasoning from the conclusion (within the stimulus) within it.

Does this ring any bells?

Studying for the LSAT / Casca, AJ
« on: December 05, 2004, 12:24:18 PM »
ON the games section did you notice 4as in a row and then 3as in a row?

I have seen many post that this occured but never found a consensus

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5