Law School Discussion

To any and all moderators - Is it at all possible to revive one of the most hilarious threads ever?  The thread, link shown below, seems to have been altered to a completely different topic.  It was a thread giving advice to 1L students and has turned into some political thread for some reason:

jason1114
Jr. Member

Posts: 7


     Re: brewha=erapit
« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2006, 01:37:27 PM »  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The notion that brewha, contributor to the greatest LSD discussion thread of all time (see: http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/students/index.php/topic,3993.0.html), and Erapitt are the same is just plain silly.

Only socialist hippies would argue against this obvious truth. Chuck Norris hates hippies, so you don't want to be a hippy do you?

MWUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!!! My school actually published something I wrote.

wow am i sick of these threads.  the calculation isn't rocket science.

For any of you getting ready to take Evidence next semester (or in the future generally), the Lexis Nexis (sp?) Q&A book is a MUST have for exam prep.  I believe that it has been out of print for a few months and is relatively hard to find, I had to check the law book store of about 3 local schools to get mine, but it is well worth the search.  It has about 300 regular multiple choice questions and their complete answer explanations; ALONG with an entire "mock" final exam - again answers included. 

The price is very fair, at about 20 bucks.  I am in no way affiliated with that publication and have no incentive to push for it.  I just got an A in the class and practiced almost exclusively from that text.  I hope this helps future evidence students. 

This is definately a first in my law school career.  I guess I should be thankful because the error made me lose a TON of time reworking the problem.  Here is a copy of the email I just received from our Dean.



To the Students in Professor XXXXXX's Secured Transactions Class:

        As you know, there was a significant error on the first question
of your examination.  Unfortunately, the error was not discovered until
well after the examination had begun.  When the error was corrected,
students responded in different ways.  Some went back and revised their
answer to the first question.  Others simply plowed ahead and left their
answer alone.  Still others had decided to answer the first question
last and thus were not adversely affected at all.

        After consultation with Professor XXXXXXX, we have determined
that there is no means by which the exam can be graded fairly.
Accordingly, the entire class will receive a grade of "Pass."
Unsatisfactory as this outcome may be, it represents the only viable
resolution.

        We sincerely apologize for the error. 


Dean xxxxx