Law School Discussion

Oct 1997


F,G,J,K,L,M,O  ARE THE ONLY APPLICANTS BEING CONSIDERED FOR SOME POSITIONS AT A NON PROFIT ORG. ONLY APPLICANTS WHO ARE INTERVIEWED WILL BE HIRED. HIRING PROCESS MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CONSTRAINTS:

If G is interviewed, J is interviewed.
If J is interviewed, L is interviewed.
F is interviewed.
F is not hired unless K is interviewed.
K is not hired unless M is interviewed.
If M is hired and L is interviewed, O is hired.



Question
           If M is NOT imterviewed, which one of the following MUST be true?

A- K is not interviewed
B- K is interviewed but not hired.
C- F is not hired
D- F is hired but K is not hired.
E- F is interviewed but K is not hired.



I have worked on this for half an hour now and don't see why the answer is what it is.................











Answer is

    (E)

I did debate in HS, liked it. Think it has any bearing. I noticed we have quite a few on here who love to debate!

I kinda' like the Socratic method. I feel it really makes me think and figure things out....probably the reason it is used?

I just don't want to spend the first day of law school making out with the 'porcelain throne' (I have watched the Paper Chase too many times~ )

Do you like the Socratic method and is it still widely used?

If I see everyone talking about scores then I know it is ok to check my email....I am such a chicken!

ONE!  As we knew.
I asked her about the Feb 2002 exam and told her that the games were exact same. I asked if maybe it had been the exp on the Feb 02 exam. The said even if it was they never use the WHOLE exp section again. I also told her about the same RC passages....she said that was very odd. She would put a not in the system to look for my email....? She said they will write me back for sure.

What do ya' think?