Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - Wildflower

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Studying for the LSAT / can someone explain this answer to me...
« on: August 13, 2005, 07:20:12 PM »
Oct 1997


F,G,J,K,L,M,O  ARE THE ONLY APPLICANTS BEING CONSIDERED FOR SOME POSITIONS AT A NON PROFIT ORG. ONLY APPLICANTS WHO ARE INTERVIEWED WILL BE HIRED. HIRING PROCESS MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CONSTRAINTS:

If G is interviewed, J is interviewed.
If J is interviewed, L is interviewed.
F is interviewed.
F is not hired unless K is interviewed.
K is not hired unless M is interviewed.
If M is hired and L is interviewed, O is hired.



Question 8)
           If M is NOT imterviewed, which one of the following MUST be true?

A- K is not interviewed
B- K is interviewed but not hired.
C- F is not hired
D- F is hired but K is not hired.
E- F is interviewed but K is not hired.



I have worked on this for half an hour now and don't see why the answer is what it is.................











Answer is

    (E)

2
Studying for the LSAT / October or December?
« on: August 13, 2005, 05:41:16 PM »
Does anyone know- or have a thoery- on whether or not it is better to test in Oct or Dec? Is having more people test with you a plus? I guess that would depend on what your scoring.... but any opinions would help. Thanks.

3
Studying for the LSAT / Debate in HS? Good for LS? Trial...
« on: March 02, 2005, 03:44:29 PM »
I did debate in HS, liked it. Think it has any bearing. I noticed we have quite a few on here who love to debate! ;)

4

This is what they emailed back after I asked about the old Feb test being so similair......
I am sure my score is now officially 121-
 :'(



February 23, 2005

 

 

Dear Ms. XXXXX:

 

We have received your email of February 16, 2005 concerning the February 2002 LSAT.

 

Your question has been circulated to appropriate staff members for review and we will respond, in writing, as soon as possible.

 

Thank you for your interest in the LSAT.

 

Sincerely,

 

Stephen W. Luebke

Senior Test Specialist

 

SWL\ml

5
I kinda' like the Socratic method. I feel it really makes me think and figure things out....probably the reason it is used?

I just don't want to spend the first day of law school making out with the 'porcelain throne' (I have watched the Paper Chase too many times~ :o)

Do you like the Socratic method and is it still widely used?

6
Studying for the LSAT / Ok, so once we get into law school...
« on: February 25, 2005, 03:12:45 PM »
....what kind of law do you want to practice and why??

Me, I think I will try IP.......but I don't know much about it? Anyone familiar with it?
I like business or criminal, too.

7
Studying for the LSAT / I have to check LSD before I check my email...
« on: February 25, 2005, 02:44:29 PM »
If I see everyone talking about scores then I know it is ok to check my email....I am such a chicken!

8
General Off-Topic Board / Ok, I don't get it. My hubby and I
« on: February 24, 2005, 08:17:52 PM »
We just had this huge *ss fight because I cut my hair~~
Why is it a big think for guys??

9
Studying for the LSAT / Hmmm, spoke to LSAC this morn. Exp section was #
« on: February 17, 2005, 11:18:30 AM »
ONE!  As we knew.
I asked her about the Feb 2002 exam and told her that the games were exact same. I asked if maybe it had been the exp on the Feb 02 exam. The said even if it was they never use the WHOLE exp section again. I also told her about the same RC passages....she said that was very odd. She would put a not in the system to look for my email....? She said they will write me back for sure.

What do ya' think?

10
Studying for the LSAT / Is this avatar too much...
« on: February 14, 2005, 07:48:55 PM »
It's really how I feel...waiting for that d*mn score to grab me like some monster under the bed.

Maybe I will change it...

Pages: [1] 2 3