In yo face, Charlie Murphy!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Topics - Dizzle
This might seem like a silly question...
should I use my raw score as it would be when that test was administered, in say 1999
should I use my raw score as it would be used for a test today...
I know the percentiles have gone up in recent years, as a 80 raw score was a 167 a few years ago and a 163 today
so what do you think?
« on: October 29, 2007, 03:43:07 PM »
Yes, I know.
My undergrad GPA stinks. Don't remind me. I had my issues (family, personal, financial, physical, you name it)and they will be addressed in my PS or addendum where needed.
Surprisingly, I do have some decent "soft" factors going for me. I will have finished an MS with a 4.0 (I better), I currently work as an Investigator for the State Government and I have LOR's from very well respected people throughout the state.
Where should I go? I scored a 160 on an LSAT diagnostic and 165 on a proctored, timed practice test. So, my real goal is to get as close to if not over 170 if possible. I think 165 is more of my fail safe predicition though.
So what do you think? I don't have specific location issues or monetary concerns so I am open to all suggestions. Feel free to sell a certain school to me. My LSN list is in my signature.