Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - Skittles

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Where should I go next fall? / Who's with me?
« on: February 26, 2005, 08:48:40 PM »
..

2
Where should I go next fall? / dreams that tease
« on: February 26, 2005, 09:44:35 AM »
I had a dream I got accepted to a school I really want to go to. I was going through that big white envelope when *puff* I woke up.
 
Isn't that cruel?

3
Acceptances / Anyone know about Case's Dean's Scholarship?
« on: February 24, 2005, 08:19:21 PM »
Does anyone know if the Dean's Scholarships at case just cover tuition, or do they cover tuition and living expenses (or books?).

Thanks

4
News Discussion / That's it...
« on: November 02, 2004, 10:04:24 PM »
I'm moving to Canada.  I swear... if this stupid ass country re-elects Bush, I will concede that Canadians are smarter than Americans and move to Vancouver to live with my mother-in-law.  And all those who know how I feel about Canada... well, you understand what a grave statement this is.

5
Law School Applications / Let it go already...
« on: October 25, 2004, 12:53:58 PM »
URMs make up only about %15 of any given law school.  And they score only about 8% less on the LSAT than non-URMs. Also, I'm guessing at least 1/3 of the URMs they admit would likely get in even if they weren't URMs. So we're talking about 10% of admitted applicants there.  The affect A.A. has on your chances of getting into any particular school is so insignificant it's hardly worth bitching about even if you don't agree with it. 

6
Studying for the LSAT / CALLING ALL RETAKERS!!!
« on: October 08, 2004, 01:59:08 PM »
For the love of God people, stop asking how many points you can improve by and go to this site:

http://www.lsac.org/LSAC.asp?url=/additional-info/lsat-repeater-data.asp


and good luck with the LSAT ;)

7
Law School Applications / Tricky LOR question
« on: August 12, 2004, 07:58:37 PM »
I have two good LORs.  And I know that's all I need, but I could get one more that I'm not sure if it will be good or average or what.  But it would be from a big-shot (the head of the department where I'm getting my masters).  So should I take the gamble?  I'm currently working for him so he does know me... I just don't know how much he likes me.  I get mixed signals.  He's hard to read.

8
Studying for the LSAT / Retake Statistics
« on: August 12, 2004, 03:11:05 PM »
Hey fellow retakers, I thought this infor might interest you all...

http://www.lsac.org/LSAC.asp?url=/additional-info/lsat-repeater-data.asp

9
Studying for the LSAT / numbers
« on: July 21, 2004, 10:01:46 AM »
Here you go guys... from USNews and World report:

1.   Yale University (CT)
3.80-3.97      169-175

2.   Harvard University (MA)
3.76-3.94      169-174

3.   Stanford University (CA)
3.73-3.95      166-171

4.   Columbia University (NY)
3.52-3.82      167-173

5.   New York University
3.52-3.82      168-173

6.   University of Chicago
3.44-3.74      167-171

7.   University of Michigan Ann Arbor
3.43-3.76      164-169

    University of Pennsylvania
3.45-3.83      164-170

9.   University of Virginia
3.55-3.81      165-170

10.   Duke University (NC)
3.47-3.81      162-169

    Northwestern University (IL)
3.40-3.80      166-170

12.   Cornell University (NY)
3.50-3.75      165-168

13.   University of California Berkeley
3.65-3.90      160-168

14.   Georgetown University (DC)
3.42-3.78      167-170

15.   University of Texas Austin
3.41-3.83      160-166

16.   University of California Los Angeles
3.51-3.83      162-168

17.   Vanderbilt University (TN)
3.46-3.82      162-166

18.   University of Southern California
3.50-3.72      164-167

19.   University of Minnesota Twin Cities
3.36-3.82      160-165

20.   George Washington University (DC)
3.34-3.74      162-167

    University of Notre Dame (IN)
3.38-3.79      161-166

    Washington University in St. Louis
3.20-3.80      161-166

10
Studying for the LSAT / Oct. Retakers... we can get extra time
« on: July 03, 2004, 08:13:41 AM »
If you read the accommodated testing forms carefully, it includes lack of sufficient intelligence as a psychological handicap for which you can get more time. Seriously!

Isn't that funny? So I think those of us who bombed the June test should apply for extra time, what do you think?   ;)




(note: in case you can't tell, I'm kidding... except about what LSAC says about intelligence... that's actually true)

Pages: [1] 2 3