Ok, Contracts seems to be the most difficult for me to write answers for. My general question is when the UCC applies do you only stick to a UCC analysis? Take a hypo that obviously involves applying UCC 2-207 additional terms. You have a transaction of goods greater than 500 bucks but there is nothing in the fact pattern that says whether the state enacted the UCC or not. Do you even address the common law issues that a battle of the forms fact pattern presents or do you just stick to the UCC analysis?