Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - uscitalian1982

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 19
Current Law Students / Re: Imus
« on: April 11, 2007, 10:18:19 AM »
I am comparing the principle, not the situation. 

Current Law Students / Re: Imus
« on: April 11, 2007, 08:36:49 AM »
There is a double standard here.  What about all of the hip hop "artists" that constantly insult women with their misogynistic slurs?  Or, even better, how about this video in which the speaker calls for the TERMINATION of the entire white race?

Double standard?

Current Law Students / Re: Natural Law v. Positive Law
« on: February 14, 2007, 06:22:56 AM »
I like to think of natural law as law that is "written on the heart" whereas positive law is man-made law that that has natural-law at its root.  An example of this would be murder.  If there were not law against murder, most men would have it written on their heart (natural law) that murder is wrong.  Man has taken this sentiment, and prohibited murder (man-made law).

Current Law Students / Natural Law v. Positive Law
« on: February 13, 2007, 07:38:51 AM »
What is the difference?  Are any of you learning about natural law in your secular law school? 

Job Search / Re: I'm # 4 in my class, and can't get an interview
« on: February 02, 2007, 06:09:09 AM »
Drop out.  Your legal career is over. 

Current Law Students / EZ Rules for Civ Pro
« on: January 30, 2007, 08:40:36 AM »
I have the 1999 version of EZ Rules.  I could not find one that is more current. I know their have been several revisions made to the FRCP.  I don't care about minor changes.  My question is have there been any MAJOR revisions since this book was published?  Thanks. 

Current Law Students / Re: Joinder Question- Help!
« on: December 14, 2006, 07:41:32 PM »
But D2 could assert a claim against D1, right?

Current Law Students / Joinder Question- Help!
« on: December 14, 2006, 07:33:50 PM »
Under FRCP 19a (compulsory joinder) and FRCP 24a (intervention of right), my prof said that complete diversity does not matter.  So does that mean if P1 (VA) v. D1 (SC) and then D2 (VA) comes into the case by either 19a or 24a that that would be OK?  Thanks. 

Current Law Students / Calling All Slackers
« on: November 29, 2006, 08:50:53 AM »
Have you lost the motivation to study?  Are you burnt out? Do you keep telling yourself you will start studying at a certain time only to watch yourself procrastinate for another few hours? Do you keep reassuring yourself that you can wing it?  Join the thread...

Current Law Students / Re: Answer
« on: November 11, 2006, 12:35:02 PM »
Thank you.  I know that it resembles the complaint, but I did not know if there were any major changes. 

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 19