can't you just wait one more year and your scores from 3 years ago will be off your record? i am pretty sure there is a 3 year limit on old scores.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - sleazyd
i'm not doing bridge...what are you guys doing to search for a place to live
i want to get a 1 BR and I am wondering if I should fly down in july or are there leasing agents that can help you find a nice place?
What are you guys doing?
my Testmasters instructor went from a 143 initial diagnostic to scoring a 172 on the actual exam. that's a 29 point increase. and since the first test, he joined testmasters and taught the LSAT for a year (obviously not everyone has this opportunity) and has scored several 180's on his diagnostics since then. he is waiting for the 3 years to elapse from his first score so that he can have a 180 as his only test score on record. he was very confident that he would land a 180 with a little time to spare, and based on his instruction and demonstrated ability I have no reason to believe he will not.
so yes, i think if anyone of reasonable intelligence with A LOT of dedication (this is an extreme case) can score in the 99th percentile if not the 99.99th percentile.
« on: May 14, 2005, 03:16:33 PM »
I am a pre-1L so I may not know much but I heard a speech by the UW LS Dean Joe Knight here in Seattle and he says he works 80-90 hours a week and has since he was a 1L at Columbia. He says he budgets his time in weekly intervals of 168 hours.
I don't have the ability to replicate the compelling nature of his speech but here are some of the key takeaways: Don't constrict yourself with a "need" for sleep. He says he's trained himself to need an average of 4-5 hours per night. He answers his email before bed and when he wakes up. He gets his workout in at 5 am, makes his daughter breakfast before school at about 6am and is off to work by 7:30. He leaves work about 7pm (in Seattle that is good thing because of the horrible traffic). He doesn't really eat lunch unless he's meeting a "client" (usually donors and the like).
The point is that you can be really efficient with your time and still spend time with your family, friends etc. If you can restrict work at the office to stuff that must be done there, and do a lot of the "extras" like answering email at home then your time suddenly becomes a lot more abundant. As for the idea of 168 hours in a week, as opposed to 24 hours in a day...that is a very novel and productive way of thinking as I see it. Some days you can be more or less productive as long as you meet your weekly quota. Assuming BigLaw firms are OK with you coming to work before 8 and getting your "other" stuff done off-campus you may be just fine.
In closing, the thesis of Dean Knight's speech (which was delivered extemporaneously and very impressively) was to "Think outside the Box." If you want to get something done and you're only working 90 hours a week, there are still 78 hours left in the week for you to accomplish that thing!
accounting major...the tax accounting courses at my school are taught by two tax lawyers (both with LLM's from NYU) and I definitely feel like I am getting a good mix of business and law. One of them actually stresses the importance of the use of the Socratic method (unlike most teachers here in wussy Seattle).
Other business courses give you a sense of what you need to do to succeed in the workplace and especially the entrepreneurial side if you are going to eventually practice by yourself. I do wish I was a little more well rounded but definitely feel advantaged.
Where should I go next fall? / Re: Columbia (0), Cornell 15k, Michigan (10k), UCLA (10K), or Lewis & Clark (25« on: April 29, 2005, 11:34:58 PM »
i vote for UMich