Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - neci

Pages: [1] 2
1
Wait List / Re: Email from Admissions-
« on: August 12, 2005, 08:07:56 AM »
Howard has a part-time program?

2
Wait List / Re: American
« on: May 04, 2005, 04:13:03 PM »
AU updated their website.  No fulltime slots available currently, they have part-time slots it appears.

3
"It would seem obvious to anyone that education "should" be valued because that's almost the only way to get a decent job and be paid well."


When one is educated or aware of a situation...it is unbelievable what it easy.

When you are on the opposite end of the spectrum (not aware, uninformed, or uneducated), it is unbelievable what is hard or difficult.


Sometimes to get a full perspective of things, we need to push ourselves to imagine if we do not know something, how hard it  may be.

4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Answers for Oct 02 test
« on: February 07, 2005, 09:16:00 PM »
Thanks a bunch

5
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Answers for Oct 02 test
« on: February 07, 2005, 07:55:53 PM »
any one have these answers????  Please help

6
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Questions from hell- PLEASE help!!
« on: February 07, 2005, 12:34:54 PM »
Ok-
I have read through the others and I see a pattern...I don't think you are reading closely and actively enough..
For example #17 you choose
make an attack on the character of the opponents (look again at the argument and see if that is true)
Then take a look at A and see if this makes more sense


7
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Questions from hell- PLEASE help!!
« on: February 07, 2005, 12:27:51 PM »
#6: Weaken Question---Identify the conclusion--the conclusion says that practically because of the many different components of modern culture, National Identity is threaten.
The answer you select does not strengthen or weaken the argument (to me it is a statement about culture change).

Rather B shows that the same or similar idea that the author attributes to changing National Identity is actually stabilizing it.

I hope this makes sense, they r a little hard to explain.

8
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Questions from hell- PLEASE help!!
« on: February 07, 2005, 12:21:34 PM »
LR
#5 This is a paradox question...you need to look for an answer that would explain why the drug and PT and the PT by itself gives the same result.  If the specialist are accurate with there prediction, then you explain the paradox.

E is blatantly wrong...it addresses another muscle, that does not help to clarify the paradox in anyway.

9
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Questions from hell- PLEASE help!!
« on: February 07, 2005, 12:15:46 PM »
which section?

10
I came up with B...After process of elimination, I was down to B 0r D...but because D used sometimes (I got rid of that quickly) "never" that was used in B reflects the all and only used in the first premise.

Pages: [1] 2