Discussion
Resources
|
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
1
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR section« on: December 04, 2004, 07:44:28 PM »I cant remember exactly but the meteor question had to do with the probability of it happenning just because it happened 100,000 years ago - it was an invalid argument. i agree 2
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR section« on: December 04, 2004, 07:34:20 PM »
forthe "as they say" application of usage question. i guessed D blindly. someone tell me they remember it being DEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
3
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR section« on: December 04, 2004, 07:29:21 PM »I think the administrators + small details was wrong only because that is really one facet of the overall inference, which was that they weren't maximizing efficiency. uh..... your supposed to do that. most stronlgy supported = logically inferred = must be true = doesn't matter whether it's this facet or that facet as long as it must be true 4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR section« on: December 04, 2004, 07:26:22 PM »
re. decentralizatin-inference Q
i meant number three.. answer was baout small details for sure. maximizing efficiency was a trap because decentralization is sufficient but by no means necessary to maximize efficiency/productivity or whatever(given what was said in the stim) 5
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR section« on: December 04, 2004, 07:22:39 PM »I think the answer for the decentralization question had something to do with the section leader always being innovative or something like that. re. decentralizatin question. it was an inference Q correct? i strongly believe the answer was about someone in the central administration works gets daily sh*t from periphery or something EDIT: i meant number three.. 3 details for sure. maximizing efficiency was a trap because decentralization is sufficient but by no means necessary (given what was said in the stim) 6
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR section« on: December 04, 2004, 07:12:42 PM »
the resolve the paradox except question about tuition
it was either abt faculty salaries or scholarships 7
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR section« on: December 04, 2004, 07:03:18 PM »
here's one that i thought was kinda tricky
it was one of those what role does the statemnet play... it was about wheat or some crop... conclusion was that there is going to be a food shortage...... because one wheat farms are operating at maximum efficiency (this was a premise for what i thought was a sub-conclusion ... i cant remember the short sentence) and two population growth. it was either "subconclusion" or "a phenomenon, the casual argument of which is the conclusion" or something 8
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR section« on: December 04, 2004, 06:59:39 PM »but wasn't that the point they disagreed about, b/c the one guy said ALL govt's don't benefit artists, but the girl said in democratic govt's they encourage artists to speak against the govt, and so thats the piont they disagreed about. they didn't disagree whether govt was made up of society's values. the democratic govt has the values of questioning the govt or something. your right. the answer that i thought i chose wasn't that one. memory distortion.... are you sure the first dude said "all" governments? i distinctly remmeber concluding that that Answer choice was a trap tho, the one ur supporting 9
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR section« on: December 04, 2004, 06:53:21 PM »Anyone remember the LR question about computers? It was something about how it is difficult to add accessories due to the complexity of setting the jumpers and switches. It was a weaken question i think. agree with matt. for sur 100% abt this one 10
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Logical reasoning questions...« on: December 04, 2004, 06:51:29 PM »Lets see what i can remember...these are answers that might jog your memory ME TOO. and your the guy that kep tsaying LR was easy as *&^% so i hope it was yor experimental no offense |
