10
« on: April 29, 2008, 04:19:55 PM »
Yes, well. There is scene in one of the Star Wars Movies (I am watching then with my 7 year old son, kind of cool to see them now) where a huge seacreaturish fish grabs a hold of the jedi's ship as it travels under the sea. Just as things look bleak a completely huger (good word no?) fish comes up from behind and grabs the ship-grabbing fish. A Jedi turns to the amorphous muppet-like alien and says "There's always a bigger fish." I find it odd that someone from Rutgers could take such a dismal almost condescending position on a tier 3 school. Search around the boards and you will find posters asking the equivalent of "Emory or Rutgers with money" and a fair share of replies saying, in effect, it is tragic mistake to take a (lower) tier 2 over a tier 1. Another poster will ask "Cornell or Emory with money" and just as many people will decry the foolishness of taking any school over a T14. There's always a bigger fish. I have been accepted to St. John's, Rutgers Newark, and Seton Hall as well as Pace and NYLS (all PT) and have tried to listen to the notion that (unless it's T14) most all choices are regional. Given that I would focus on Philly vs. NY and what you want to do. If you have an interest in Environmental or International I would suggest Pace regardless of USWNR ranking. I intend to focus on the fit rather than the number-- Unless of course I get off the waitlist at Fordham...