Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - thefaint

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
1
Studying for the LSAT / Re: who else just got their score?
« on: June 27, 2007, 06:54:53 PM »
gardening club, ghetto house building, for sure a flame.

2
Studying for the LSAT / Re: who else just got their score?
« on: June 27, 2007, 06:49:37 PM »
is this for real? has anyone else got their score?

3
ya the LR was a repeat too

4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June Experimental Section
« on: June 11, 2007, 08:08:41 PM »
Experimental LR was from a previous test. I knew all the answers it was really weird. Did anyone else recongnize that?

5
Studying for the LSAT / Preptest 50
« on: June 07, 2007, 06:49:18 PM »
Preptest 50 Q23 regarding insomnia


why is A not a strengthener?

6
Studying for the LSAT / Preptest 49 section 4 (LR 2) question 19
« on: June 05, 2007, 05:26:17 PM »
Ok so the answer is A which states most of the world's forests will lose at lease some of their plant or animal species if no one intervenes.

But, the argument says that:

great majority (most) of forests are fragments
and of the fragments they typically (most) can't sustain themselves and this leads to the endagered species death.

so if:
51 fragmented forests out of 100 total forest and of those 51 fragmented 26 have lost their ability to sustain themselves in the long term and thus the animals there die. Shouldn't that lead to a some....

 and thus shouldn't the answer be some  of the world's forests will lose at lease some of their plant or animal species if no one intervenes.


B is the only thats close but couldn't it be possible that 49/100 (less than a majority) of forests are intervened in and thus some of the fragmented ones have interventions and those might be the ones in which all the world endangerd species are located.

If someone could explain what I'm missing it would be greatly appreciatd.
thanks

thanks

7
Studying for the LSAT / Re: older tests accurate?
« on: June 04, 2007, 04:12:20 PM »
I think it depends on your strengths. If you are good at LG and bad at RC then I would think the fact that the new exams have an easier LG and harder RC will hurt you. As for me, my scores have been consistent and I started from preptest 1.

8
Studying for the LSAT / Re: WTF?
« on: June 03, 2007, 05:28:26 PM »
thanks

9
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Erasing on the Test
« on: June 03, 2007, 05:27:44 PM »
be gentle and you should be fine.

10
Studying for the LSAT / LR question from PT 47 sect. 1 q. 26
« on: June 03, 2007, 05:25:01 PM »
So I was hoping that someone could explain not only the right answer C but also the wrong answer D.

For C I was wondering how this would strengthen the argument. I thought it added nothing since it seems to do nothing but repeat the premise in the second sentence.

As for D does this not make the sample more representative or is it irrelevant because the argument does not make any generalization about first-graders as a whole?

thanks

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7