Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Catwoman

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
General Off-Topic Board / Re: MAS: Don't Disturb the Sexy
« on: December 27, 2007, 02:35:09 PM »
I'm just bitter because whenever I pop in here, I don't recognize anybody anymore. Who are you people?

2
General Off-Topic Board / Re: MAS: Don't Disturb the Sexy
« on: December 27, 2007, 02:31:24 PM »
What is this, a circle jerk? The new posters this cycle are so lame.

3
Law School Applications / Re: probation addendum--judge me!
« on: November 17, 2007, 02:28:06 PM »
I kind of like it as-is. Its an "outside of the box" addendum, showcases great writing skills, and makes you look good in spite of your probation offenses. I say keep it or maybe find a way to edit it down a bit without losing its overall feel and flavor.

I liked it too! I was wondering why I was the only one. It can be trimmed a little bit, but I wouldn't butcher it too badly. To be honest, I don't know a lot about what is required/expected in an addendum, but I thought this was a good piece of writing.

4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Totally clueless... all answer choices included
« on: November 15, 2007, 04:24:30 PM »
There was actually a thread discussing this question not that long ago...

http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,93936.msg2418423.html#msg2418423

5
General Off-Topic Board / Re: FYI: studymaster lies about his IQ
« on: November 14, 2007, 01:31:39 AM »
What kind of an IQ test supposedly told you that you had an IQ of 145? I am curious. Because all available evidence seems to suggest otherwise.

6
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Negate this
« on: November 13, 2007, 02:43:33 AM »
Yeah I get it now I had forgotten how to logically negate conditional statements. Thanks for the explanation Jeffort.

And thanks, too, to GCoop for his half-assed attempt at an explanation, right?   ;D

7
Studying for the LSAT / Re: stuck between two choices...
« on: November 08, 2007, 04:46:47 PM »
Which one of the following would, if true, most strengthen the claim made by the author in the last sentence of the passage (lines 54-58)?

A)  Several African novelists who draw upon the oral traditions of west Africa use binary narratives, even though they have not read Marxist theory.

E) Binary oppositions do not play an essential structuring role in the narratives of some films produced by other filmmakers who subscribe to Marxist principles.

I know clearly A strengthens, but why doesn't E?  And why is A a better answer than E?/

Looks like erick2naive doesn't always follow his own advice. Here he only posted two answer choices.

8
Studying for the LSAT / Re: stuck between two choices...
« on: November 08, 2007, 02:55:54 AM »
Mmm, yeah, I read your original thread. I was unimpressed. Process of elimination is for kittens.

9
Studying for the LSAT / Re: stuck between two choices...
« on: November 08, 2007, 02:11:31 AM »
OP--kits44, that is--READ MY POST ABOUT POSTING ALL 5 CHOICES and NOT MAKING CLEAR WHICH ANSWER IS TCR.

 ::) Oh please. It is his question; it's his perogative whether or not he wants to list all five answer choices.

10
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Dog abnormalities, weaken question
« on: November 04, 2007, 02:18:44 PM »

It gets at the more formal relationship between assumption and conclusion.


You should design a course that avoids all that pesky "formal relationship between assumption and conclusion" stuff.

Pages: [1] 2 3