Conversely, maybe some schools will accept you on valentine's day, and you would know that it really is true love!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - bobknob
« on: February 14, 2007, 02:18:02 AM »
« on: February 14, 2007, 12:18:33 AM »
« on: February 14, 2007, 12:00:02 AM »
I hope I don't sound like I'm being hard on LSAC, I love them to death, and you would too, if you knew what other grad students went through during their application cycles.
I just think it's lame of them to try to police a messageboard rather than actually change internal policies to combat cheating.
« on: February 13, 2007, 10:55:14 PM »
Yeah, I saw another guy's LSN profile that was in almost the same situation (18, great stats). Law schools just don't seem to look favorably towards 18 year old applicants.
Just out of curiosity, did you make a big deal about your young age and quick graduation rate in your PS/DS/etc, or did you just sort of try to hide it?
« on: February 13, 2007, 02:16:48 AM »
Administer a different test in Hawaii and have the rest simultaneously across only four time zones.
« on: February 13, 2007, 02:06:53 AM »
I think that the best course of action would be that LSAC doesn't reuse portions of any test, and never administers the same test at a later date for anyone, because that has the potential to be unfair regardless of whether people make post-mortems on LSD. If anything, the post-mortems on LSD do a remarkable job of demonstrating how foolish LSAC would be to ever reuse the same test material because it most definitely gives people the ability to cheat.
Whether you prohibit post-mortems on LSD or not is a non-issue, because the above helds in either instance.
Edited, because I said something slightly unfair.
« on: February 13, 2007, 01:56:39 AM »
Does anyone else think 24 sucks? I'm as big of a Jack Bauer fan as anyone, and I love watching him kick everybody's ass, but everytime he's not on the screen, I find myself fast-forwarding past all the stupid & pointless bull.
« on: February 13, 2007, 01:41:06 AM »
This was pretty obvious. You listed "cute" gymnast as one option, and just law student as the other. Given that most girls in law school probably aren't cute like cute gymnasts, I'll go with the safer option.
If you listed cute, female law student, however, I'd probably choose her.