Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - kulesh1

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 36
1
Studying for the LSAT / Re: kulesh...
« on: February 25, 2007, 08:04:01 PM »
wow, u are witty milton, what a db

2
Studying for the LSAT / Re: kulesh...
« on: February 25, 2007, 04:28:13 PM »
yeah, i have no idea what my score is gonna be,   i got through 3 sections quite swimmingly on the rc, had 4 min left for the last section,  dont think i missed more than 4 on both lr combined and the games, i got through one perfect,  2 of them i just couldnt get one or two questions and i had to guess on the last game.  my mind was a little fatigued after four sections, to say the least.  it was a wierd test i thought, lr were abnormally easy  and the games seemed abnormally difficult. o well, weel all know soon enoguh. late

3
Studying for the LSAT / Re: kulesh...
« on: February 25, 2007, 02:24:23 AM »
lol, i appreciate the love.   ive been gone for a while,   havent had much time to chat after leaving community college for a legit school (classes are kind of hard and too much partying).    anyway, i made the first four sections my female dog only to get messed up a little by the games.    still hoping for a 162, but im taking again in june anyway, so it really doesnt matter.  late

4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Prep test slump?
« on: January 10, 2007, 02:22:55 AM »
so you have been missing two more questions, i would hardly call the a slump.  sounds like you are doing great just dont stress out about it to much. late

5
Studying for the LSAT / Re: 170+ requires your innate ability
« on: January 09, 2007, 05:44:01 PM »
exactly what im saying, a good memory by its lonesome gets you nowhere.   combined with skill, it benefits u......how could you possibly learn a process of thought to the degree that you are able to adroitfully anticipate answers without having a good memory. if that isnt memory, please define it for me.   (not intending to be a jerk)

6
Studying for the LSAT / Re: 170+ requires your innate ability
« on: January 09, 2007, 02:39:10 PM »
most deff hank, i grant you that a solid long term memory is really unessesary to answer each question correctly, however, if you can recognize the patterns in which the inferences usually occur, it can greatly improve your time.   for example, sure you can do a linear game without prior knowledge of common inferences, but if you have those impressed in your brain you will  know what to look for and consequentially have a greater tnedancy to find the correct answer choice as opposed to methodically eliminating 4 answers.  this is revelant for the grouping games even more so imo.   for the lr, as many people have pointed out, when you have done enough problems, you begin to anticipate the correct answer prior to even reading the choices.   without a good memory you arent ever going to get to this level.    you are correct in your implication that a good memory is not nessesary to excel on a logic test, but it certainly can help you.

7
Studying for the LSAT / Re: 170+ requires your innate ability
« on: January 09, 2007, 12:15:39 PM »
tiffany, really what i am saying is that a very high iq isnt nessesary to achieve a good score.  imo good focus and work ethic are way more imporatant.  i bring up iq on the other extreme to grant that someone who isnt bright AT ALL is obviously not going to excel on the test.  the iq equation  is such a vague notion to begin with, but i think it is pretty well established that it encompasses at least some logic skills and working memory.   so i think it is at least a reliable indicator of intelligence on both extremes to some degree/someone who has a 140 obviously isnt dumb, and someone who has a 100 obviously isnt "gifted"

8
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Practice Tests
« on: January 09, 2007, 12:02:04 AM »
dont worry if you have trouble with the older games, the new ones r cake in relation. i say buy the old ones first but you deff have to get the new ones at some point. late

9
Studying for the LSAT / Re: 170+ requires your innate ability
« on: January 08, 2007, 11:26:12 PM »
i have completely changed my opinion after a thorough analysis of my personal performance.    sacrificing my social life(tonight was the first night ive been out in about a week) for the feb test ive been able to get my scores all the way up in to the 170 range.  i have been studying 4 hours a day and the only time i miss a question now is out of carelessness.   it is my contention that all that is needed for 170+ is a good memory, to recognize the sentance structures and logic patterns, and a fair amount of intelligence. granted, someone with an iq of 100 would never be able to get a 170, but i beleive that most people in the 120+ range will be able to score well with dedication.    i have average intelligence(for a college student), but a very strong memory, and i am going to easily score above a 165. anyway, thats my new opininon.

10
Studying for the LSAT / Re: new approach
« on: January 03, 2007, 06:25:07 PM »
your welcome soldier, good luck with the studying

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 36