Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - LatherRinseRepeat

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 84
1
Current Law Students / Re: BarBri or Law Preview?
« on: July 22, 2007, 07:44:05 PM »
Thanks!!!!   I didn't know this was such a hot topic.  They need to put the search button back on the pre-law discussion board. 

2
Current Law Students / BarBri or Law Preview?
« on: July 22, 2007, 07:07:08 PM »
Don't know if this question has been asked yet or not....but since the "search" icon is gone, I'll just repost.

Has anyone taken the Barbri or Law Preview prep courses before starting law school?  Any opinions on these 1 week courses that are $1000?  Is it worth it, or a total scam?

3
Studying for the LSAT / Re: hey kids......
« on: July 23, 2007, 12:39:36 PM »
How've you been?  I see there is a new crowd here.  Out with the old, on with the new, i suppose.

What happened to the "Search" button?!?!

Didn't you piss off a lot of people last time you were here?


That's what happens when you're fabulous.....    8) 8)

4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: hey kids......
« on: July 22, 2007, 06:58:12 PM »
I'm GOOD!!!!  CAN'T WAIT TO START LAW SCHOOL!!!!!!   



Don't know if this question has been asked yet or not....but since the "search" icon is gone, I'll just repost.

Has anyone taken the Barbri or Law Preview prep courses before starting law school?  Any opinions on these 1 week courses that are $1000?  Is it worth it, or a total scam?

5
Incoming 1Ls / BarBri or Law Preview
« on: July 22, 2007, 06:55:50 PM »
Don't know if this question has been asked yet or not....but since the "search" icon is gone, I'll just repost.

Has anyone taken the Barbri or Law Preview prep courses before starting law school?  Any opinions on these 1 week courses that are $1000?  Is it worth it, or a total scam?


6
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Help on prep test 19
« on: July 22, 2007, 12:00:13 PM »
K,
Were you being sarcastic, or do you really need an explanation for this one?

LRR

7
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Stuck in a rut
« on: July 22, 2007, 11:49:03 AM »
In the third question, it says that V goes before P. Take a look at question three in game one.

F _ V P _ _ M?

That is impossible because there are only 6 units. In the above scenario there would have to be 7.

What the hell!

Question 3 is saying if V goes immediately AFTER P, not the other way around.

8
Studying for the LSAT / hey kids......
« on: July 22, 2007, 02:27:49 AM »
How've you been?  I see there is a new crowd here.  Out with the old, on with the new, i suppose.

What happened to the "Search" button?!?!

9
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Help on prep test 19
« on: July 22, 2007, 02:23:40 AM »
Sorry love, but the answer to that question is D, not B or E.  Double check to see if you noted the page, test #, section, correctly....

10
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Stuck in a rut
« on: July 22, 2007, 02:19:53 AM »
Hey kid....

As for your first question, yes.... P _ _ > M looks good to me.  The rule is saying that a minimum of 2 groups are between P and M, but more could be between them as well.....Hence the "AT LEAST 2"   Your understanding of this rule is fine.

Your second question....  Exactly one group marches after F, but before V.  I see where you got lost.  The rule is just saying those two groups have one group between them.  F _ V is diagrammed correctly.  This rule says nothing about the position of the F in relation to the other groups.

Your third question...I don't know what you're asking.  But, the follow also work.  P F _ V M   or   F P V _ M are also valid.

Hope that helps....

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 84