Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - maddlibs

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 101
what if you get raped without asking?  does it not count? 

::likes the word "mollycoddle"::

::dislikes new poster::

I'm fairly certain that YOU will not have to worry about that.  Ever.

I don't care much for you, either.  Your lack of a substantive post history plus your overly large post count indicates that:

a.  You have no real-life friends
b.  You aren't really smart enough to post here, let alone attend law school
c.  Are probably ugly

Actually- hic

I met Tasha (or someone named Tasha) at a fundraiser for potential law student scholarships'ses or somtheing er other.....burp

at first, youre right... she wuz ugly, but then as the night wore on and the Goose began to flow....I dont kno...something happended, something romantic....she started to grow on me and I frautered her or tried to at least. What a woman! Nights like that make me feel lucky (good karmatized) to be a Senator.

Then as the night wore on I offered to give her a ride home and it was all down hill from there. SHe was scared as hell of my car for some reason.

women. hic

General Off-Topic Board / Re: Why Obama will lose in the fall
« on: September 19, 2008, 12:35:41 AM »
Yoko Ono equated fetuses with tumors. 

Fun fact. 

which explains why she is remembered not for her intelligence, but for being married to a famous dead white guy

General Off-Topic Board / Re: Why Obama will lose in the fall
« on: September 15, 2008, 11:46:56 PM »
my point miss P is that the pro-choice argument usually boils down to: because it's inconvenient.  while they make much of the plight of women who are raped or very sick, the vast majority of abortions carried out in this country come down to a simple decision about what is most expedient.  this seems like a profoundly solipsistic position.

I'm afraid you're wrong.  Further, as evidenced from the kinds of responses you're receiving here, you can see that this kind of caricature is not much of a conversation starter -- much like the stereotyping that you (however inaccurately) tried to pin on Piggy and the snide remarks on hunting about which you gave Sax such a hard time.

I try to understand how it would feel to believe that fetuses are actually very little people, and I do think abortion would seem depraved If I believed that.  Now it's your turn to think about the difficult position women are in when they are faced with an unexpected or unwanted pregnancy -- and the consequences for children who may be born to parents (more often just mothers) who are ill-equipped to provide for them.  More often than not, the choice to terminate a pregnancy is the product of a reasoned judgment about whether it is responsible for a (young/poor/uneducated/in school/single/unhealthy/etc.) woman to try to rear a child.  Like you, the people who think women are in the best position to make that judgment also believe they are honoring life, by thinking about the kinds of lives they want for children, about the importance of nurturing and strong families, etc.  When you claim that this important choice is a matter of mere convenience, you show how little you understand your opposition.  You also demean mothers, as if the tremendous work they do to bring children into the world and nurture them to independence is a mere "inconvenience," and not a whole life-changing tangle of burden and loss.  (Not that motherhood is only a burden, as I understand that it can be incredibly rewarding for women who are prepared for it.)

Also, while you are correct that rape and maternal death are extreme examples, your opposition of those "excusable abortions" on the one hand to "convenience abortions" on the other is facile.  For one, leaving rape to the side, women -- even those in long-term relationships -- do not always have perfect control over the kind of birth control their partners use or when they have sex.  I, for one, have never slept with a man who didn't at one point try to have intercourse without a condom, sometimes resorting to trickery to make it happen (and I am a leftist former AIDS activist who tends to date people a lot like myself).  If you think that younger, less savvy and confident women always negotiate the terms of the sex they have to their complete satisfaction and knowledge, please send me your bank account number so I can deposit my Nigerian friend's treasure there.  Moreover, while death of the mother is an extreme outcome for pregnancy, there are lots of pregnancy-related health problems (e.g., perinatal diabetes, pre-eclampsia) that make carrying a baby to term a very difficult choice for some women (e.g., those who are obese, older, hypertensive). Finally, a lot of women who may believe their partners are ready for parenthood (and act accordingly in the bedroom) find themselves alone when they learn they are pregnant. 

I could say much more about all of this, but I don't really see the point of discussing abortion here in this thread.   I think I'll stop here.

ETA: I agree with archival about the rest (and about what your rape exception means in particular).

as law students/lawyers we all know that in the unlikely event Roe v. Wade (which is built upon a really crappy argument, i think even rabidly pro-choice people concede this) is overturned, abortion will not suddenly become illegal in the U.S.  this is 100% fear-mongering. 

It certainly is not.  We all know that abortion would become illegal almost immediately in some states.  South Dakota, Nebraska, Utah . . .   

P, if you do not think that fetuses are little people then why all the arguments? Why all the fuss about women being burdened, or left with the consequences of a mistake, or letting a baby suffer by being reared by unfit parents and so on?

If you believe it is not a human person, no argument is needed on you part.

Simply say that you do not believe it is a person and any belief to the contrary is mistaken and here is why it is not a person......

If you have a mole growing on you, or a cyst, or some other piece of unwanted tissue, you get it cut out or removed. No argument is needed and it would seem silly to offer one.

If someone were to tell you that the tumor is a really a little person and that you should keep it on your body- I hope you would respond with the fact that it is indeed just a tumor and that the guy is crazy.

But wouldn't it be odd if you actually tried to justify your decision to remove the tumor by appealing to arguments that tried to show how the tumor is a burden to you, or that "every mole should be a wanted mole" or something like this?

With Abortion there is only one question........

What is it?

If it is not a person no reason is needed.

If it is a person no reason is justified.

The fact that you say that you do not believe a fetus is a little person combined with the fact that you offer many reasons to justify the abortion of the fetus tells me that perhaps you yourself are unsure. You say it is not a person, but you feel the need to justify the abortion- giving details of hardship that the woman would face if forced to keep the pregnancy.

No justification is needed. Tell them it is not a person and why, and that all you need. ;)

General Off-Topic Board / Re: Am I a racist?!
« on: September 15, 2008, 01:48:10 AM »
I would not date Mexicans.

Does this make me a racist?

It depends on why.

you do not have to be attracted to every race or every culture.

I happen to like mexicans. I think they are very attractive. This does not make me a progressive and enlightened multiculturist (whatever that is).

Some races are unattractive to me. I would not want to date them. This does not make me a racist. Some cultures eat things that make those people smell awful to me. I would not date someone that I thought smelled terrible whether they smelled bad from cultural reasons or whatever. I don't care- if you smell, no dating period.

Some people (as a race) have features that are physically unattractive to us. Thinking they are an ugly race does not make you a racist. Some cultures have men that are ultra macho- if you don't like this, then say with pride "I do not want to date mexicans" or whoever

Liberals won't want to date evangelicals for the most part (and vice versa). Does this make them bigots?

There are more differences than just skin color or race. Traditions and ideas can be a source of hate as well.

Just don't hate people. No explanation is needed. We all do this, and we know when we do it. We do it with all of the above everyday in varying degrees and we are all guilty.

And you know's because of the F*&#in Koreans. They make me do it and they know it.

General Off-Topic Board / Re: Why Obama will lose in the fall
« on: September 15, 2008, 01:19:57 AM »
It's not "a life", any more than sperm and eggs are life.  It's potential life, just as those are.  And cloning has proven we don't need need both of these to create an embryo.  So do you weep for every lost sperm and egg as well?  And should most IVF treatments be banned, as extra embryos are nearly always created, and eventually, discarded.

BTW, you leave out the fact that the chicken soup of precautions you, your sister, and the government which fails to provide basic health care for millions of people in this country, assert are necessary to prevent contraceptive failure cost a chunk of change, if all used every day.  So should the married, working poor just not have sex, just so as to please you embryo worshipers?

Fry- let Miss P argue the pro choice position. The above is so jumbled and confused I cannot even respond.

It makes me feel like a mosquito in a nudist colony, I don't know where to begin.

General Off-Topic Board / Re: Geography Riddles
« on: September 15, 2008, 12:49:21 AM »
leaf enforcer

backwards R


General Off-Topic Board / Re: Is John McCain's VP selection a disaster?
« on: September 10, 2008, 11:21:39 PM »
Is McCain's VP selection a Disaster? I know when you started this thread you did not know what we know today, September 10th, but by now it should be obvious.

It's a complete disaster!

McCain is beating or tied with Obama in every poll. He's up by 11 points among white women, raising millions in mere hours, has thousands (instead of hundreds) attending his campaign stops, has energized his base beyond all expectations, and is up 10 points among independents. I could have kept going but I got tired. Palin even has her own doll out because some bozo wants to make money off her popularity. Obama doesn't even have his own doll and he is more popular in Germany than David Hasselhoff!

Yes it's a disaster! What a stupid question!

I haven't been this upset since Grey Goose changed their formula- BURP

We'll be back soon enough. Obama won't stand for this. He is gonna push this naughty librarian book banner aside like we did with Hillary.

We taught Hil to sit down and get out of the gentleman's way, Palin will lean to sit as well.

General Off-Topic Board / Re: ITT you name your biggest turn-offs.
« on: April 07, 2008, 09:16:11 PM »
for me,

Major: lack of self confidence and lack of personal independence/individualism

minor: smoking

I know my smoking is  a turnoff, but Im just not strong enough to quit. I don't think I'll ever be able to stop. I wish the government would come up with a program to help me. Wanna go out some time?

General Off-Topic Board / Re: SFLSD: I don't quite understand
« on: April 07, 2008, 09:09:02 PM »
That's a nice image.  (Charlie Brown)

The others are just...kinda gone (although brit came back for a couple days last week or something.) 

Who's Thou posting as now?
Any thread that has a ROn Paul apologist is him.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 101