Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - rnb

Pages: [1] 2
1
Current Law Students / Re: Type of sport coat for summer associate?
« on: May 16, 2009, 09:50:46 PM »
Not events, just daily use.  I guess our dress code is pretty much slacks/sport coat/tie.

My firm is in a somewhat "trendy" area.  Lets just say it's not exactly your old school Southern firm.

Thanks for your help.  Any tips on what fabrics I should avoid?  I'm guessing wool is usually the way to go?

2
Current Law Students / Type of sport coat for summer associate?
« on: May 16, 2009, 12:55:30 PM »
I know sport coat/wool slacks/dress shirt is pretty much the standard for most law firms.  But is there a specific kind of sport coat a summer should wear?  I know for interview suits there were all kinds of "requirements" for # of buttons/colors/material...what about sport coats?  Pretty much anything (besides ridiculous colors) goes?  Can someone post a few pictures of what good sport coats would be?

Thanks in advance!

3
^Very true about Texas having more mid-size firms. 

I'm not sure about the litigation thing though.  The California mid-size firms have similar practice areas to big firms (and about split 50-50 for litigation and transactional).  The Texas ones might be more litigation focused. 

Your midlaw = 30-150 lawyers?

I'm not sure what I would consider "midlaw."  I posed this question in another thread and nobody answered.  I would say 30-150 is a fair definition though (and roughly the definition I used when referring to Texas and California mid-size firms). 

4
^Very true about Texas having more mid-size firms. 

I'm not sure about the litigation thing though.  The California mid-size firms have similar practice areas to big firms (and about split 50-50 for litigation and transactional).  The Texas ones might be more litigation focused. 

5
I actually think there just aren't many mid-size firms (if that's what you mean by "mid-level").  Once a firm grows over about 50 attorneys, it becomes more likely to get taken over by a big firm.  So you end up with a lot of big firms and a lot of 5-10 attorney firms. 

In San Francisco, for example, I'd guess there are only about 5 firms that are 50-150 attorneys. 

6
Current Law Students / Conlaw 2 supplement?
« on: October 27, 2008, 08:56:21 PM »
Any good suggestions for a Conlaw 2 supplement?  Pretty much anything that will help with free speech and/or equal protection analysis.  THANKS!

7
Job Search / Re: So what exactly qualifies as BIGLAW?
« on: October 23, 2008, 05:48:01 PM »
What about midlaw?  I'm guessing that's based less on prestige, and more just any firm 50-250 attorneys?

8
Job Search / Re: Help me pick between 2 firms PLEASE
« on: October 15, 2008, 09:14:32 PM »
^Thanks, that's very helpful.

Your comments about the practice areas actually make this even tougher. 

If Firm B were excellent at their 3 areas, and Firm A was just "good" at all 10 of their areas, this would be over.  But Firm A is easily top 3 in the state in a couple areas (and practice areas that are very, very stable).  Firm B only has 3-4 practice areas, but isn't OUTSTANDING at any of them.  A couple of those areas also might be cyclical (estate planning, real estate, M&A, general business litigation).

But with that said, Firm B, while young, has had pretty solid and consistent growth over the last 10 years.  And I guess the fact that they haven't cancelled their summer program (or even made it smaller) this year says something. 

9
Current Law Students / Re: PLEASE help me decide between 2 firms
« on: October 15, 2008, 04:23:56 PM »
I don't quite follow.  Should I just ask an associate if management is up front about the financials of the firm?

10
Current Law Students / Re: PLEASE help me decide between 2 firms
« on: October 15, 2008, 03:29:10 PM »
One for Firm A, one for Firm B.  I told you I'm exactly 50-50 on this.


Pages: [1] 2