Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;
Discussion Discussion
Resources Resources

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Craving Oyer

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: The Official I'm Going to X School Thread
« on: March 22, 2009, 01:54:42 PM »
Richmond  ;D

2
Acceptances / Accepted at University of Richmond!
« on: January 14, 2009, 12:41:30 PM »
Ding  :)

3
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Should we expect our Dec 2008 LSAT score next week?
« on: December 21, 2008, 10:38:12 AM »
Couple threads on another discussion board seem to lend some credence to a December 23rd release. We'll see...

4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: How have ppl "dealt" will their scores?
« on: December 21, 2008, 10:37:16 AM »
Quote from: Jeepstress on December 21, 2008, 10:13:40 AM
I've lived through 4 catastrophic illnesses, the murder of two friends, and an armed invasion of my workplace by a knife-wielding assailant who stabbed someone in front of me, therefore I will not be too affected by my LSAT score when I receive it. 

So when I get my score I'll just take a deep breath and wait for the schools to which I've already applied to make their decision.  No matter what it is, it's not the end of the world.


Damn. At least you drive a Jeep.

5
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Flaw in the Reasoning: Error of Conditional Reasoning
« on: November 30, 2008, 02:33:11 PM »
Quote from: Kels on November 30, 2008, 01:45:48 PM
I don't have the book on me but it would guess the stimulus goes something like this.....if someone does X, then they deserve punishment. They concluded from this that because someone is punished, they must have done X.

The answer choice says...Mistakes being sufficient (i.e. doing X) to justify punishment for being required to justify punishment. 

This would be correct because there could be many things that could warrant punishment besides doing X. The wording is funny though and I could understand how you would misinterpret it.

Thanks, that explains it!

6
Studying for the LSAT / Flaw in the Reasoning: Error of Conditional Reasoning
« on: November 30, 2008, 11:06:48 AM »
So I'm reading the LR Bible and this potential answer choice for mistakes in reversal makes no sense to me:

"Mistakes being sufficient to justify punishment for being required to justify it." (page 376)

Does that make any sense to anyone else?

7
Studying for the LSAT / Re: October conversion chart
« on: November 16, 2008, 02:30:11 PM »
Has 100 questions been the norm lately, not 101?

8
Studying for the LSAT / Re: 21 Days to Test Day...
« on: November 15, 2008, 03:56:39 PM »
I've been studying pretty regularly for about 6 weeks now. I plan to take a practice test a day (except Thursday, my day off), two on Saturday, and on Sunday I have my LSAT review class. Otherwise, I'll use my time to review incorrect answers, and study weak areas in the Bibles.

Good luck!!

9
Studying for the LSAT / 21 Days to Test Day...
« on: November 15, 2008, 08:44:58 AM »
How are you spending the last 3 weeks?

10
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Speed Training for LR
« on: November 13, 2008, 11:56:36 AM »
Thanks, Earlcat. That makes sense. I'll still get through the preptests timed, but I'll use some of the pre-2000 LSATS to break up and just sit for an hour and work through a section slowly focusing on the logic.

Pages: [1] 2 3