Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - betasteve

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
General Off-Topic Board / Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« on: June 12, 2009, 10:03:01 PM »
whose foot you prefer she break?
Wait?  You correct usage?  My word spinning now.

2
Meta Discussion / Re: meet julie
« on: June 12, 2009, 10:01:52 PM »
Whoel thrad bout julie???   beta lap on fire!!!! 
I took picture of it here

3
you not obama supporter, just bpretending.  and war crimes war crimes, putz.
there no war crime here.  you no understand definition.  Iz ok, you liberal.  I understand you make up in "cause" what you lack in intelligence. 

4
General Off-Topic Board / Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« on: June 11, 2009, 06:14:03 PM »
that warm feeing coffee you spilled.

and sometimes julie's brain cloud lift, just for moment. perhaps there hope even for you, although either way you going need clean pants.
You right about that!

It really too bad Sotomayor doesn't understand 2nd amendment and think that cause best give undesireable result, must mean test is discriminatory, though. THink her logic broken. Ah, women... almost always the case.

nonsense.  she just following precedent.  you got problem that?

easterbrook--reagan appointee--just wrote similar opinion nra v. chicago holding no incorporation.  nra has applied cert.  that how it supposed work.  after all, four stooges can bring issue before scotus.
That no Ricci case, though..  Ricci stupid.  Sotomayor stupid, woman.  She even break her own foot walking.  Durrr

5
General Off-Topic Board / Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« on: June 04, 2009, 11:17:49 AM »
that warm feeing coffee you spilled.

and sometimes julie's brain cloud lift, just for moment.  perhaps there hope even for you, although either way you going need clean pants.
You right about that! 

It really too bad Sotomayor doesn't understand 2nd amendment and think that cause best give undesireable result, must mean test is discriminatory, though.  THink her logic broken.  Ah, women...  almost always the case.

6
General Off-Topic Board / Re: scotus nominee clearly unqualified
« on: June 04, 2009, 10:57:38 AM »
mmmmhhhmmmm  whole thread of Julie talk make lap warm. 

but grammar mistake you had in 4th post.  It sound to correct. you edit it now, please for keep the fantasy alive. 

Also, anyone notice how Sonia like drop and add her accent when she say her last name.  It says, I am english, BUT I AM HISPANIC!  Also it make sound like boxing ring introduction. 

It too bad sonia be activist judge, and rule on emotion not law..  It make beta sad.  Luck for me, warm lap feeling will come again when Julie respond. 

7
"it"?
Julie want it.  Julie like sit on OP lap, make op lap feel warm. 

8
General Off-Topic Board / Re: What are you wearing right now?
« on: May 30, 2009, 09:12:50 PM »
Julie Fern's panties.  Make beta feels good.

9
General Off-Topic Board / Re: Helmholtz from LSD is a real a-hole.
« on: May 29, 2009, 03:35:23 PM »

Don't forget the improper use of "redundant" too. Unless he actually thinks that humans and garbage are the same thing.
I see you are pretty ignorant yourself.  I am posting, and it's highly likely I am not a f-ing monkey, cat, or your mom.  Thus, I am human...  It's a little pedantic to iterate that out in an insult.  Oh sorry, translation: It's a pointless usage of human.




Too lazy to write something? 

10
General Off-Topic Board / Re: Helmholtz from LSD is a real a-hole.
« on: May 29, 2009, 03:25:21 PM »

Don't forget the improper use of "redundant" too. Unless he actually thinks that humans and garbage are the same thing.
I see you are pretty ignorant yourself.  I am posting, and it's highly likely I am not a f-ing monkey, cat, or your mom.  Thus, I am human...  It's a little pedantic to iterate that out in an insult.  Oh sorry, translation: It's a pointless usage of human.

Pages: [1] 2 3