Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - rwalker130

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Brand new, still in the plastic shrink wrap.

Our Canadian Property prof thought it would be useful to add a US text to our list, only he forgot to put it as "reccomended" instead listing it as "required"... sadly it is too late to return it to the Bookstore.

Best offers, can ship it to Canada or the US (live in Windsor/Detroit).

RW

send me a PM or reply here.


2
Oh Canada! / GPA conversion question
« on: May 11, 2006, 04:35:51 PM »
I am wondering how my GPA will be translated by LSDAS. 

I went to Western in the late 90s and I am the proud owner of a 70.85% 4 year GPA.  Which on Western's grade scale at the time was a B. The scale had no pluses or minuses, except for A+. 

I would think that it would be possible to look at the chart located on the lsac.org FAQ section for LSDAS.  But that chart shows a Scale out of 100 that is definitely not how our scale worked. 

So is my GPA a 3.00 as a straight B? Or is it a 2.7 as a B- (which is what OLSAS says)? 

Just curious, as I have not taken the plunge to sign up for an LSDAS account yet. 

Thanks,

RW

3
Studying for the LSAT / Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logical Reasoning
« on: December 13, 2005, 12:16:07 AM »
Not sure if this has surfaced yet in the list, but in case anyone is still looking for LR questions.

I believe at least two questions were "role of statement" questions.

Can't remember more details than that.

Anyone?

RW

4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logic Games
« on: December 06, 2005, 05:02:30 PM »
Also, any C's in the last game?

RW

5
Studying for the LSAT / Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logic Games
« on: December 06, 2005, 04:41:14 PM »
Anyone recalling the W rule for the appliance fixing game?

RW

6
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR - listening to the people!
« on: December 06, 2005, 04:37:48 PM »
This is ringing a bell for me too. 

Was it a neccessary sufficient question?  Possibly. 

Need others to fill it in.

RW

7
Studying for the LSAT / Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logic Games
« on: December 05, 2005, 12:26:59 PM »
agreed-- i don't think there was a rule about W

No, there was a rule for W. I just don't think it was stated as above.

RW

8
Studying for the LSAT / Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logic Games
« on: December 05, 2005, 12:03:56 PM »
In the appliance repair game, there was a rule about W and so far, no one has remembered it.

Anyone?

RW

W repaired TV's or VCR's or both

Really?

While I can't remember all the rules myself, I REALLY don't remember the W rule reading like that.

Anybody else?

RW

9
Studying for the LSAT / Re: MASTER RC LIST - ONLY 4 LEFT!!
« on: December 04, 2005, 04:41:55 PM »
I also agree that there was a question about the scientists eventually researching how human cells begin polarizing.  This was a direct reference to the quote in the passage that this was a "tempting mystery". 

RW

10
Studying for the LSAT / Re: POST-MORTEM December '05 - Logic Games
« on: December 04, 2005, 04:38:20 PM »
In the appliance repair game, there was a rule about W and so far, no one has remembered it.

Anyone?

RW

Pages: [1] 2 3