« on: October 10, 2008, 06:35:34 PM »
^lol, a confabulated response in order to deviate from what i'm saying. my core issue was on judaism. you are not applying its basic principles to your dictum. judge judy, who will be smarter than you ever will, insults people in her courtroom all the time by calling them 'idiot,' 'moron,' and 'stupid.' does that make her ignorant? we just like stating the obvious.
your issue-spotting is doing you more harm than good because of your effort to ridicule me when i have stated simple facts. you are convoluted and cannot get to the point. you might not be able to live with someone, i don't know, but judging by your posts, you love to get caught up in unnecessary arguments and get on my bad side when clearly, i never once insulted you. rather, you insulted me.
there were no grammatical conventions in my post. this isn't an appellate brief. this was a simple post that asked a simple question, and it seems you can't answer simple questions, which has foreshadowed your inability to address anything simple.
my outlandish assertions? lol. what outlandish assertions? don't use flowery language or big words to make it seem as if i did something that deviated from normal. i asked you why don't you follow the core tenets of judaism, which includes kindness and humbleness. and guess what? you chose not to answer it (again), because you can't stand the fact that you're deviating from what your religion is teaching you to do, to be a better person.
you clearly can't answer a simple question. instead, you chose to skirt the issue. i don't care what you think, the undeniable aspect of this conversation is that you couldn't even answer a simple question without stirring controversy. it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out, but maybe we'll get one for you.