Law School Discussion

Off-Topic Area => Meta Discussion => Site Suggestions and Announcements => Topic started by: TLFKARG on February 03, 2005, 08:06:44 PM

Title: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TLFKARG on February 03, 2005, 08:06:44 PM
Andrew,

HBCU started the Black Law Student Discussion Board and has been an active member since its conception.  Throughout the history of the board, there have been a number of instances in which users who do not regularly post on BLSD came on and made disrespectful and racist comments and have failed to follow the rules of the BLSD community which HBCU established.  In order for BLSD to continue to function as a peaceful and informative board, we would like to request that you give HBCU the position of moderator. 

Ruskie, et al.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: MJ on February 03, 2005, 08:11:42 PM
I agree. 

MJ
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: CaliToD.C. on February 03, 2005, 09:14:44 PM
I completely support this movement!

But on one condition. As long as WHEN HBeezy gets intelectually manhandled and served he don't go deletin my prolific posts.  ;D

POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!

LONG LIVE BLSD!!
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: Victor on February 03, 2005, 09:24:22 PM
I agree. Andrew you are not doing your job. Stop being a lazy bum and sticky the BLSB thread and make HBCU a mod. We are growing impatient with you Andrew.


Vic
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TrojanChispas on February 03, 2005, 09:36:30 PM
hey andrew, thanks for the site, you've done a wonderful thing here for us.  as people try to undo the work you and others have put in by flaming, etc. there have ben others that have been efective at repelling these aggravations. HBCU has been the best unofficial moderator and officially augmenting him to moderator status would be a service to the LSDB community
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: Regal_Muse on February 03, 2005, 09:52:33 PM
I agree


HBCU is my baby's daddy!  ;)

SHHHHHHHHH don't tell my hubby!
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: cali444 on February 04, 2005, 12:07:15 AM
I agree. 

Cali444
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TDPookie1 on February 04, 2005, 12:19:58 AM
I agree. Andrew you are not doing your job. Stop being a lazy bum and sticky the BLSB thread and make HBCU a mod. We are growing impatient with you Andrew.


Vic


wtf?  this isn't andrew's job.  this is a service that he provides for us, of his own volition.  don't blame andrew for this  >:(

::flexes::

i'll add my name to this petition of sorts for HBCU:

TDPookie1
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: MsJay9 on February 04, 2005, 06:00:09 AM
 :) Yes Give HBCU the Mod Job for BLSD   :)

MsJay9
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 04, 2005, 08:55:51 AM
blk_reign
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: mivida2k on February 04, 2005, 08:59:27 AM
Concur with HBCU being given Moderation rights.

mivida2k
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: jaxon on February 04, 2005, 10:28:11 AM
*vomit*


Andrew,

HBCU started the Black Law Student Discussion Board and has been an active member since its conception.  Throughout the history of the board, there have been a number of instances in which users who do not regularly post on BLSD came on and made disrespectful and racist comments and have failed to follow the rules of the BLSD community which HBCU established.  In order for BLSD to continue to function as a peaceful and informative board, we would like to request that you give HBCU the position of moderator. 

Ruskie, et al.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TLFKARG on February 04, 2005, 11:25:56 AM
*vomit*


Andrew,

HBCU started the Black Law Student Discussion Board and has been an active member since its conception.  Throughout the history of the board, there have been a number of instances in which users who do not regularly post on BLSD came on and made disrespectful and racist comments and have failed to follow the rules of the BLSD community which HBCU established.  In order for BLSD to continue to function as a peaceful and informative board, we would like to request that you give HBCU the position of moderator. 

Ruskie, et al.

Precisely the kind of demeaning and unuseful comment we are seeking to avoid.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: DOOLEY on February 04, 2005, 01:44:44 PM
DOOLEY predicts the following: within a day, this HBCU person will be a mod, because 4 or 5 people signed his petition. DOWNY had over 20 signatures, mostly from old-school LSDers. He was never made a mod and likely wouldn't have been one with 100 signatures. Is this fair? DOWNY was here for almost a year. Maybe if DOWNY was black he could be a mod.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: Victor on February 04, 2005, 02:25:43 PM
DOOLEY predicts the following: within a day, this HBCU person will be a mod, because 4 or 5 people signed his petition. DOWNY had over 20 signatures, mostly from old-school LSDers. He was never made a mod and likely wouldn't have been one with 100 signatures. Is this fair? DOWNY was here for almost a year. Maybe if DOWNY was black he could be a mod.

You are jumping to conclusions. TDPookie and kgd2b1 are Global Moderators. We only ask that HBCU become a Local Moderator, which means he can moderate what goes on in the Black Law Student Board thread. Thank you and have a lovely evening feeding birds some wonder bread.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: DOOLEY on February 04, 2005, 02:28:34 PM
Ok you make a good point.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TLFKARG on February 04, 2005, 03:51:35 PM
DOOLEY predicts the following: within a day, this HBCU person will be a mod, because 4 or 5 people signed his petition. DOWNY had over 20 signatures, mostly from old-school LSDers. He was never made a mod and likely wouldn't have been one with 100 signatures. Is this fair? DOWNY was here for almost a year. Maybe if DOWNY was black he could be a mod.
I am as old-school as they come on LSD and I signed both petitions.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: jaxon on February 04, 2005, 06:04:05 PM
the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TUNA on February 04, 2005, 11:27:10 PM
the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.

TUNA thinks Ruskie has a brilliant plan. TUNA thinks every racial and ethnic group needs their own board with their own moderator. This way, we can promote true separatism and racial tension under the guise of being "politically correct," which seems to be the objective of LSD posters. The moderators shouldn't be called "moderators," they should be called "warlords." This will promote the balkanization of the board and allow people to have race wars, like in Somalia. The warlords can fight with each other and struggle for control by deleting posts and threads and kicking people of different races out of their forums. Soon affirmative action discussions will break out and factions will develop. One faction will be racist white people who hate AA. The other one will be white people who think it’s really trendy and cool to “love” AA and shout in a load voice that they are defending the downtrodden minorities of the world. All of LSD will love them and the world will be a better place.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TLFKARG on February 05, 2005, 12:14:00 AM
the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.

TUNA thinks Ruskie has a brilliant plan. TUNA thinks every racial and ethnic group needs their own board with their own moderator. This way, we can promote true separatism and racial tension under the guise of being "politically correct," which seems to be the objective of LSD posters. The moderators shouldn't be called "moderators," they should be called "warlords." This will promote the balkanization of the board and allow people to have race wars, like in Somalia. The warlords can fight with each other and struggle for control by deleting posts and threads and kicking people of different races out of their forums. Soon affirmative action discussions will break out and factions will develop. One faction will be racist white people who hate AA. The other one will be white people who think it’s really trendy and cool to “love” AA and shout in a load voice that they are defending the downtrodden minorities of the world. All of LSD will love them and the world will be a better place.

Nice try, a-hole, but your logical gymnasitics are not relevant here.  HBCU started the board and he should be able to moderate it to enfoce the rules for the community which he set up.  It has nothing to do with the color of his skin.  Furthermore, I think HBCU will agree that people of all races and ethnicities are welcome to post on BLSD so long as they abide by the rules which the regular posters have agreed to be bound.  No one plans to censor anything but lewd and unecessary attacks, which aren't welcome on ANY board and are not tolerated by ANY moderator.  HTH.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: jaxon on February 05, 2005, 04:10:46 AM
its not a "board", its a thread, jackass. there is only one board here it is "Law School Discussion".  if you guys want your own "board" you can go register the domain name blacklawschooldiscussion.org  i am sure it is available.


the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.

TUNA thinks Ruskie has a brilliant plan. TUNA thinks every racial and ethnic group needs their own board with their own moderator. This way, we can promote true separatism and racial tension under the guise of being "politically correct," which seems to be the objective of LSD posters. The moderators shouldn't be called "moderators," they should be called "warlords." This will promote the balkanization of the board and allow people to have race wars, like in Somalia. The warlords can fight with each other and struggle for control by deleting posts and threads and kicking people of different races out of their forums. Soon affirmative action discussions will break out and factions will develop. One faction will be racist white people who hate AA. The other one will be white people who think it’s really trendy and cool to “love” AA and shout in a load voice that they are defending the downtrodden minorities of the world. All of LSD will love them and the world will be a better place.

Nice try, a-hole, but your logical gymnasitics are not relevant here.  HBCU started the board and he should be able to moderate it to enfoce the rules for the community which he set up.  It has nothing to do with the color of his skin.  Furthermore, I think HBCU will agree that people of all races and ethnicities are welcome to post on BLSD so long as they abide by the rules which the regular posters have agreed to be bound.  No one plans to censor anything but lewd and unecessary attacks, which aren't welcome on ANY board and are not tolerated by ANY moderator.  HTH.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: jaxon on February 05, 2005, 04:12:41 AM
the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.

TUNA thinks Ruskie has a brilliant plan. TUNA thinks every racial and ethnic group needs their own board with their own moderator. This way, we can promote true separatism and racial tension under the guise of being "politically correct," which seems to be the objective of LSD posters. The moderators shouldn't be called "moderators," they should be called "warlords." This will promote the balkanization of the board and allow people to have race wars, like in Somalia. The warlords can fight with each other and struggle for control by deleting posts and threads and kicking people of different races out of their forums. Soon affirmative action discussions will break out and factions will develop. One faction will be racist white people who hate AA. The other one will be white people who think it’s really trendy and cool to “love” AA and shout in a load voice that they are defending the downtrodden minorities of the world. All of LSD will love them and the world will be a better place.

180
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: mivida2k on February 05, 2005, 07:08:29 AM
the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.

Actually it was my idea.  And then Blk Reign concurred.  Ruskie volunteered to start the petition.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: mivida2k on February 05, 2005, 07:11:11 AM
its not a "board", its a thread, jackass. there is only one board here it is "Law School Discussion".  if you guys want your own "board" you can go register the domain name blacklawschooldiscussion.org  i am sure it is available.


the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.

TUNA thinks Ruskie has a brilliant plan. TUNA thinks every racial and ethnic group needs their own board with their own moderator. This way, we can promote true separatism and racial tension under the guise of being "politically correct," which seems to be the objective of LSD posters. The moderators shouldn't be called "moderators," they should be called "warlords." This will promote the balkanization of the board and allow people to have race wars, like in Somalia. The warlords can fight with each other and struggle for control by deleting posts and threads and kicking people of different races out of their forums. Soon affirmative action discussions will break out and factions will develop. One faction will be racist white people who hate AA. The other one will be white people who think it’s really trendy and cool to “love” AA and shout in a load voice that they are defending the downtrodden minorities of the world. All of LSD will love them and the world will be a better place.

Nice try, meanie, but your logical gymnasitics are not relevant here.  HBCU started the board and he should be able to moderate it to enfoce the rules for the community which he set up.  It has nothing to do with the color of his skin.  Furthermore, I think HBCU will agree that people of all races and ethnicities are welcome to post on BLSD so long as they abide by the rules which the regular posters have agreed to be bound.  No one plans to censor anything but lewd and unecessary attacks, which aren't welcome on ANY board and are not tolerated by ANY moderator.  HTH.



Everyone is welcome to post on the BLSD thread.  However, we are tired of the Trolls, Such as Yourself, posting racial and AA unnecessary comments.  Ruskie girl is Russian.  So your theory is all wrong.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 05, 2005, 07:13:28 AM
I'm trying to get an understanding as to why the "Black Law Student Discussion thread" is such a problem to some of you. No one has been banned from coming in there. None of you have posted negative responses to the Minority Topics sub-board started by Andrew. You spend too much time worried about what other people are doing instead of getting your lives together off of this board.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: jaxon on February 05, 2005, 07:40:50 AM
the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.

Actually it was my idea.  And then Blk Reign concurred.  Ruskie volunteered to start the petition.


well then it is u that is an idiot.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: jaxon on February 05, 2005, 07:42:15 AM
o i am a troll now?  i have been on this board for over a year.  you neeed to get over your pathetic self.  if your greatest claim is that you are black, you really need to get a f-ing life.



its not a "board", its a thread, jackass. there is only one board here it is "Law School Discussion".  if you guys want your own "board" you can go register the domain name blacklawschooldiscussion.org  i am sure it is available.


the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.

TUNA thinks Ruskie has a brilliant plan. TUNA thinks every racial and ethnic group needs their own board with their own moderator. This way, we can promote true separatism and racial tension under the guise of being "politically correct," which seems to be the objective of LSD posters. The moderators shouldn't be called "moderators," they should be called "warlords." This will promote the balkanization of the board and allow people to have race wars, like in Somalia. The warlords can fight with each other and struggle for control by deleting posts and threads and kicking people of different races out of their forums. Soon affirmative action discussions will break out and factions will develop. One faction will be racist white people who hate AA. The other one will be white people who think it’s really trendy and cool to “love” AA and shout in a load voice that they are defending the downtrodden minorities of the world. All of LSD will love them and the world will be a better place.

Nice try, meanie, but your logical gymnasitics are not relevant here.  HBCU started the board and he should be able to moderate it to enfoce the rules for the community which he set up.  It has nothing to do with the color of his skin.  Furthermore, I think HBCU will agree that people of all races and ethnicities are welcome to post on BLSD so long as they abide by the rules which the regular posters have agreed to be bound.  No one plans to censor anything but lewd and unecessary attacks, which aren't welcome on ANY board and are not tolerated by ANY moderator.  HTH.



Everyone is welcome to post on the BLSD thread.  However, we are tired of the Trolls, Such as Yourself, posting racial and AA unnecessary comments.  Ruskie girl is Russian.  So your theory is all wrong.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: DOOLEY on February 05, 2005, 12:41:22 PM
I'm trying to get an understanding as to why the "Black Law Student Discussion thread" is such a problem to some of you. No one has been banned from coming in there. None of you have posted negative responses to the Minority Topics sub-board started by Andrew. You spend too much time worried about what other people are doing instead of getting your lives together off of this board.

It's not a problem at all- just as long we have a Black Board, a White Board, an Asian Board, an Indian Board, a Persian Board, a Jewish Board, a Catholic Board, a Muslim Board, and boards for every group as well. I feel bad for the people who fit into more than one category, they are screwed!

We want EQUALITY, right? That IS the goal, is it not? Well great! Let's be really "equal" about it and make a board for every ethnic/religious/racial group!

This will surely make LSD a better place- think about it. The goal of LSD is not to provide a common forum for discussion about law school, heavens no! The goal is to fracture, splinter break and divide any unity that might exist. To do this we must seperate into our respective boards, just like Ruskie and TUNA suggested.

Obviously this will help spread information about law school- everyone knows it is more efficient to divide the boards and limit the flow of discussion. This can ONLY be good for the purpose of this site.

Plus, Ruskie's ingenious plan will also ACCENTUATE racial differences. Throughtout human history, accentuating differences through hostile seperatism has ALWAYS been good for everyone! The examples of endless- just look at Africa and Eastern Europe! They are PARADIGMS of harmony.

Finally, I think we should make sure to bring up AA on every topic. I agree with mivida's approach- even though AA was not an issue on this thread and Bartha had not talked about it, mivida correctly brought it up. I'm so glad, because this thread just needed an AA post.

Well, here's my take on AA:

If you don't support it blindly and wholeheartedly, you are a flagrant racist. Equality is actually a bad thing, but you have to be politically correct in allocating losses. And if you disagree with that, well sorry, you're racist! In fact, if you even questioned the legitimacy of AA, you are a horrible person and must hate everyone who isn't white. This is the only logical conclusion I can arrive at.

Also, you're probably racist if you spend lots of time telling everyone how great AA is. White people love to do this, because it compensates for their white-guilt. If you see a white person shouting and stomping their feet about AA, look out. Oops, you're a racist!

DOOLEY OUT!
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: mivida2k on February 05, 2005, 01:24:56 PM
the notion of assigning a special "black" moderator for a particular thread is absurd.  you guys are a bunch of sheep.  lets all follow ruskie and engage in mutual ass-kissing.

Actually it was my idea.  And then Blk Reign concurred.  Ruskie volunteered to start the petition.


Far from it.  But a person who would post on a petition that they should not be concerned with...............

well then it is u that is an idiot.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 05, 2005, 02:32:51 PM
I'm trying to get an understanding as to why the "Black Law Student Discussion thread" is such a problem to some of you. No one has been banned from coming in there. None of you have posted negative responses to the Minority Topics sub-board started by Andrew. You spend too much time worried about what other people are doing instead of getting your lives together off of this board.

It's not a problem at all- just as long we have a Black Board, a White Board, an Asian Board, an Indian Board, a Persian Board, a Jewish Board, a Catholic Board, a Muslim Board, and boards for every group as well. I feel bad for the people who fit into more than one category, they are screwed!

We want EQUALITY, right? That IS the goal, is it not? Well great! Let's be really "equal" about it and make a board for every ethnic/religious/racial group!


If that's how you feel then take the initiative to do so... Suggesting that HBC become the mod for the blsd thread had nothing to do with the fact that he's African American. He started the thread and has had a strong presence on these boards. We aren't limited to posted on BLSD- so I can't possibly understand why you feel separated because the thread exists. If you feel left out...then join the thread..
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: HBCU.EDU on February 05, 2005, 02:37:06 PM
HBCU.EDU for MOD 
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 05, 2005, 02:42:12 PM
You all are SO fascinated and threatened by what we do on blsd that you literally take the time out to create different screennames and antagonise various posters. The fact of the matter is that you're cowards. You'll never say 1/4 of what you say on these boards in person. You hide behind this false internet personas when in fact you should be doing more with your lives. That's the reason we have blsd. We're progressive. We aren't worried about downey or  all of the other clowns and the popularity contests on this board. We have constructive conversations on a daily basis. I can't say the same for you copycats...

Lord Bartha- for you specifically you need to be more concerned about the example that you're setting for your son and how your negative comments and views are going to shape and mold the way that he sees the world.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: jaxon on February 05, 2005, 02:44:31 PM

well, if my son read the boards i might be concerned. but he does not, so i am not.

You all are SO fascinated and threatened by what we do on blsd that you literally take the time out to create different screennames and antagonise various posters. The fact of the matter is that you're cowards. You'll never say 1/4 of what you say on these boards in person. You hide behind this false internet personas when in fact you should be doing more with your lives. That's the reason we have blsd. We're progressive. We aren't worried about downey or  all of the other clowns and the popularity contests on this board. We have constructive conversations on a daily basis. I can't say the same for you copycats...

Lord Bartha- for you specifically you need to be more concerned about the example that you're setting for your son and how your negative comments and views are going to shape and mold the way that he sees the world.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: mivida2k on February 05, 2005, 02:45:50 PM
You all are SO fascinated and threatened by what we do on blsd that you literally take the time out to create different screennames and antagonise various posters. The fact of the matter is that you're cowards. You'll never say 1/4 of what you say on these boards in person. You hide behind this false internet personas when in fact you should be doing more with your lives. That's the reason we have blsd. We're progressive. We aren't worried about downey or  all of the other clowns and the popularity contests on this board. We have constructive conversations on a daily basis. I can't say the same for you copycats...

Lord Bartha- for you specifically you need to be more concerned about the example that you're setting for your son and how your negative comments and views are going to shape and mold the way that he sees the world.


RESPECT
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 05, 2005, 02:46:44 PM

well, if my son read the boards i might be concerned. but he does not, so i am not.

You all are SO fascinated and threatened by what we do on blsd that you literally take the time out to create different screennames and antagonise various posters. The fact of the matter is that you're cowards. You'll never say 1/4 of what you say on these boards in person. You hide behind this false internet personas when in fact you should be doing more with your lives. That's the reason we have blsd. We're progressive. We aren't worried about downey or  all of the other clowns and the popularity contests on this board. We have constructive conversations on a daily basis. I can't say the same for you copycats...

Lord Bartha- for you specifically you need to be more concerned about the example that you're setting for your son and how your negative comments and views are going to shape and mold the way that he sees the world.

You don't think these views spew from the way that you live your life?
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: jaxon on February 05, 2005, 02:48:41 PM
he only sees my good side.



well, if my son read the boards i might be concerned. but he does not, so i am not.

You all are SO fascinated and threatened by what we do on blsd that you literally take the time out to create different screennames and antagonise various posters. The fact of the matter is that you're cowards. You'll never say 1/4 of what you say on these boards in person. You hide behind this false internet personas when in fact you should be doing more with your lives. That's the reason we have blsd. We're progressive. We aren't worried about downey or  all of the other clowns and the popularity contests on this board. We have constructive conversations on a daily basis. I can't say the same for you copycats...

Lord Bartha- for you specifically you need to be more concerned about the example that you're setting for your son and how your negative comments and views are going to shape and mold the way that he sees the world.

You don't think these views spew from the way that you live your life?
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: DOOLEY on February 05, 2005, 05:45:06 PM
You all are SO fascinated and threatened by what we do on blsd that you literally take the time out to create different screennames and antagonise various posters. The fact of the matter is that you're cowards. You'll never say 1/4 of what you say on these boards in person. You hide behind this false internet personas when in fact you should be doing more with your lives. That's the reason we have blsd. We're progressive. We aren't worried about downey or  all of the other clowns and the popularity contests on this board. We have constructive conversations on a daily basis. I can't say the same for you copycats...

Lord Bartha- for you specifically you need to be more concerned about the example that you're setting for your son and how your negative comments and views are going to shape and mold the way that he sees the world.

Yes, the BLSD thread is SO PROGRESSIVE. In fact, it’s so progressive that I posted a couple links so that everyone can be educated.

1. This is probably the most bigoted post I have ever seen. Note the great rhetoric used here. Obviously this guy should be a mod:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg340593.html#msg340593

2. This one deals with how to “curse black” and includes a nice comment about immigrants:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg342794.html#msg342794

3. This one shows some nice hostility toward white people, including Andrew. I cannot even fathom the uproar that would happen if a white person posted something like this:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg341688.html#msg341688

4. HBCU busts out a racist epithet about Native Americans:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg340892.html#msg340892

5. Europeans suck because they’re white:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg339033.html#msg339033

Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 05, 2005, 07:41:21 PM
Out of damn near 10,000 posts those were the ones that you chose to single out? That was a pathetic attempt coming from a person who's entire purpose for posting is to antagonise the members of law school discussion.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: PolicyLover on February 05, 2005, 07:53:05 PM
You all are SO fascinated and threatened by what we do on blsd that you literally take the time out to create different screennames and antagonise various posters. The fact of the matter is that you're cowards. You'll never say 1/4 of what you say on these boards in person. You hide behind this false internet personas when in fact you should be doing more with your lives. That's the reason we have blsd. We're progressive. We aren't worried about downey or  all of the other clowns and the popularity contests on this board. We have constructive conversations on a daily basis. I can't say the same for you copycats...

Lord Bartha- for you specifically you need to be more concerned about the example that you're setting for your son and how your negative comments and views are going to shape and mold the way that he sees the world.

Yes, the BLSD thread is SO PROGRESSIVE. In fact, it’s so progressive that I posted a couple links so that everyone can be educated.

1. This is probably the most bigoted post I have ever seen. Note the great rhetoric used here. Obviously this guy should be a mod:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg340593.html#msg340593

2. This one deals with how to “curse black” and includes a nice comment about immigrants:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg342794.html#msg342794

3. This one shows some nice hostility toward white people, including Andrew. I cannot even fathom the uproar that would happen if a white person posted something like this:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg341688.html#msg341688

4. HBCU busts out a racist epithet about Native Americans:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg340892.html#msg340892

5. Europeans suck because they’re white:
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,4122.msg339033.html#msg339033


The difference between a black man making a joke about white people and a white man making a joke about black people is that the white man operates from a place of power.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 05, 2005, 08:04:29 PM
You better speak on it Policy Lover :) :) :)
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 05, 2005, 08:12:20 PM
he only sees my good side.



well, if my son read the boards i might be concerned. but he does not, so i am not.

You all are SO fascinated and threatened by what we do on blsd that you literally take the time out to create different screennames and antagonise various posters. The fact of the matter is that you're cowards. You'll never say 1/4 of what you say on these boards in person. You hide behind this false internet personas when in fact you should be doing more with your lives. That's the reason we have blsd. We're progressive. We aren't worried about downey or  all of the other clowns and the popularity contests on this board. We have constructive conversations on a daily basis. I can't say the same for you copycats...

Lord Bartha- for you specifically you need to be more concerned about the example that you're setting for your son and how your negative comments and views are going to shape and mold the way that he sees the world.

You don't think these views spew from the way that you live your life?

for now...
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: DowneySlayer on February 06, 2005, 10:24:01 AM
i think we should allow AA and let blacks into law school.  that way when they get there they can get bad grades and bump my class rank up.  Thanks!
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TrojanChispas on February 06, 2005, 05:58:39 PM
save the trolling for xoxoxohth.com flamer
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: DowneySlayer on February 06, 2005, 06:32:00 PM


what?  i think that blacks should be in law school.  that way they can become completely crappy lawyers, defend black criminals, fail, and the number of black people in prison will go up and the rest of us will be safe.  how many blacks really want a black lawyer?  about as many who want a black doctor.  howard U MD?  run far, far away.  howard U JD?  just plead guilty and save yourself some years.  you're entitled to a lawyer...but not a good one.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: mivida2k on February 06, 2005, 08:57:25 PM
The sad part about some of these postings is that individuals like DS would not say anything of this to an African-American's face.  Just another case of a coward hiding behind his sheets oooppps I mean Internet.

Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TrojanChispas on February 06, 2005, 09:53:32 PM
probably another 13 year old that figured out how to post
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: BLUTO on February 08, 2005, 08:38:23 PM
DS is certainly a bigoted moron, but so is HBCU. Refer to the first post about this. HBCU thinks slurs are ok, so long as they're about gay people and Native Americans. I'm disgusted that many of you defended his blatant bigotry.
HTH
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: HBCU.EDU on February 09, 2005, 10:14:51 AM
DS is certainly a bigoted moron, but so is HBCU. Refer to the first post about this. HBCU thinks slurs are ok, so long as they're about gay people and Native Americans. I'm disgusted that many of you defended his blatant bigotry.
HTH

Native Americans? I've never said anything about native americans you tool. Look, I said that football player was an "indian giver".  that says more about white people and says NOTHING about native americans. Dude, what did the native americans give to anybody that they decided to take back? nothing. but, whites have given native americans many things and decided to take that *&^% back at the last minute. You don't know what the @#!* you are talking about. Read your f-ing history. 
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TUNA on February 09, 2005, 02:57:35 PM
DS is certainly a bigoted moron, but so is HBCU. Refer to the first post about this. HBCU thinks slurs are ok, so long as they're about gay people and Native Americans. I'm disgusted that many of you defended his blatant bigotry.
HTH

Native Americans? I've never said anything about native americans you tool. Look, I said that football player was an "indian giver".  that says more about white people and says NOTHING about native americans. Dude, what did the native americans give to anybody that they decided to take back? nothing. but, whites have given native americans many things and decided to take that sh*t back at the last minute. You don't know what the #@!* you are talking about. Read your f-ing history. 

Even if that post is true, it says nothing in defense of your homophobic bigotry, which was much more pronounced than your racist comment about Native Americans.

Nice try with your bull response. Yes, I am well aware whites gave Native Americans a lot and rescinded on their promises. That does not mean your language is nonetheless reprehensible- surely you know that that term has many implications and meanings.

I'm sorry for calling you out, but you're a bigot. Don't even get me started on your post about the "fags" and "homos."

HTH moron.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: HBCU.EDU on February 09, 2005, 03:41:50 PM
DS is certainly a bigoted moron, but so is HBCU. Refer to the first post about this. HBCU thinks slurs are ok, so long as they're about gay people and Native Americans. I'm disgusted that many of you defended his blatant bigotry.
HTH

Native Americans? I've never said anything about native americans you tool. Look, I said that football player was an "indian giver".  that says more about white people and says NOTHING about native americans. Dude, what did the native americans give to anybody that they decided to take back? nothing. but, whites have given native americans many things and decided to take that sh*t back at the last minute. You don't know what the #@!* you are talking about. Read your f-ing history. 

Even if that post is true, it says nothing in defense of your homophobic bigotry, which was much more pronounced than your racist comment about Native Americans.

Nice try with your bull response. Yes, I am well aware whites gave Native Americans a lot and rescinded on their promises. That does not mean your language is nonetheless reprehensible- surely you know that that term has many implications and meanings.

I'm sorry for calling you out, but you're a bigot. Don't even get me started on your post about the "fags" and "homos."

HTH moron.

That term does not have many implications anbd meanings. It means one thing. The white man like to give sh*t to people and take it back.

You are correct. I do not like fudgepackers. I hate fags. Does this mean that I can't be a mod? I'll bet you would lik to slide your man meat in some guys TUNA.       


Oh yeah...and I don't like white people either. But, does this mean that I can't be a mod? Come on...you guys made slaves of us for a couple hundres yrs so I can say *&^% like that about you and Adnrew's white ass. His family had slaves too. It must be soooo hard being white with free land and 200 yrs of free labor. Watch PBS tonight. slavery, and the making of america. @#!* YT!   
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: BIG H2001 on February 09, 2005, 03:46:17 PM
You really are a bitter guy.  I hope you go to Howard  so that you won't be forced to interact with any white people in law school.  Selfish and stupid.

What do you gain by living in the past?

Also, if you had a little historical perspective you would know that the percentage of families owning slaves was actually very low in many states and that not all white people came to America during the first wave of immigration. 
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: Regal_Muse on February 09, 2005, 03:48:45 PM
Wow that was a harsh statement. Personally I don't live in the past but I will not disrespect my ancestors by forgetting the trials and tribulations they experienced. Of course it would be easy for someone like yourself to say "move on"  or “get over it”since your people weren't taken from their homes, raped, beaten, and forced into captivity for over 400 years. Hmph.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: BIG H2001 on February 09, 2005, 03:52:36 PM
Wow that was a harsh statement. Personally I don't live in the past but I will not disrespect my ancestors by forgetting the trials and tribulations they experienced. Of course it would be easy for someone like yourself to say "move on"  or “get over it”since your people weren't taken from their homes, raped, beaten, and forced into captivity for over 400 years. Hmph.

You can remember them.  You're remembering them in the thread about Black history month.  You're remembering them by doing better and going to law school, carrying out a dream that many of them did not have the chance to fulfill.  I think you do a disservice when you have such a xenophobic attitude towards white people.  No one alive in this country has slaves or knows anyone that had slaves.  I just think it's stupid to hold slavery over the heads of people that are living now.  We had no authority over slavery, did not chooose to institute it, and also had no hand in ending it.  I would hope we could move on to other issues.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TUNA on February 09, 2005, 04:23:27 PM
DS is certainly a bigoted moron, but so is HBCU. Refer to the first post about this. HBCU thinks slurs are ok, so long as they're about gay people and Native Americans. I'm disgusted that many of you defended his blatant bigotry.
HTH

Native Americans? I've never said anything about native americans you tool. Look, I said that football player was an "indian giver".  that says more about white people and says NOTHING about native americans. Dude, what did the native americans give to anybody that they decided to take back? nothing. but, whites have given native americans many things and decided to take that sh*t back at the last minute. You don't know what the #@!* you are talking about. Read your f-ing history. 

Even if that post is true, it says nothing in defense of your homophobic bigotry, which was much more pronounced than your racist comment about Native Americans.

Nice try with your bull response. Yes, I am well aware whites gave Native Americans a lot and rescinded on their promises. That does not mean your language is nonetheless reprehensible- surely you know that that term has many implications and meanings.

I'm sorry for calling you out, but you're a bigot. Don't even get me started on your post about the "fags" and "homos."

HTH moron.

That term does not have many implications anbd meanings. It means one thing. The white man like to give sh*t to people and take it back.

You are correct. I do not like fudgepackers. I hate fags. Does this mean that I can't be a mod? I'll bet you would lik to slide your man meat in some guys TUNA.       


Oh yeah...and I don't like white people either. But, does this mean that I can't be a mod? Come on...you guys made slaves of us for a couple hundres yrs so I can say sh*t like that about you and Adnrew's white ass. His family had slaves too. It must be soooo hard being white with free land and 200 yrs of free labor. Watch PBS tonight. slavery, and the making of america. #@!* YT!   

STFU. EVERY group of humans, INCLUDING BLACK AFRICANS, have done horrible things to other people.

That doesn't mean it's ok for you to be a racist bigot. You're clearly part of the problem. Here you are talking about slavery in the past (yes, it was horrible) while clinging to the SAME racist ideology in the present. Pretty ignorant, aren't you.

Your comments about it being "soooo hard being white with free land and 200 yrs of free labor" is similarly absurd. I wonder what you would say to white abolitionists who went against the tide, sometimes at the loss of their lives, to help slaves achieve freedom.

Plus, a modern-day corollary of your ridiculous comment is to say, "It must be soooo hard being black and getting affirmative action that gets you admitted to schools you don't deserve to attend."

Now I'm sure you don't agree with that comment.


You need to grow the fvck up and realize that white people don't have a monopoly on racism. You are probably the most racist, ignorant moron I have ever encountered. I hope you never have children and pass your disgusting bigotry onto others.

HTH

Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: Regal_Muse on February 09, 2005, 04:26:31 PM
Big H I understand what you mean. However, some people just feel comfortable around their own. I can't speak for anyone else, but prsonally, I hate everyone equally. I really dislike females LOL.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: BIG H2001 on February 09, 2005, 05:05:26 PM
Big H I understand what you mean. However, some people just feel comfortable around their own. I can't speak for anyone else, but prsonally, I hate everyone equally. I really dislike females LOL.

I always liked girls like you.  We can do guy things and not have to apologize.  Carry on.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: Regal_Muse on February 09, 2005, 05:52:54 PM
Guy things are more fun than girl things LOL. FEmales are too petty and annoying. I don't get along with too many of them. Besides guys are more loyal as friends.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on February 10, 2005, 01:27:20 AM
muther fucher...HBCU>EDUcation...should have been a moderator long...long...long...long...

long...ago...



why the hold up.

why the high hat.

what bee the problem.

why the tall spat.

enought with the gripe from small, little, rich, biatchee hoes...

let it go...

make the man a moderator or we will let it flow....


and on black history month?..

cum on andrew...

cum on pookie...get laid already...

let a moderator of "real color" be aloud in the shade...

let it happen on the day of the former iranian revolt...feb-rues-airy ninth...little pint.

let it happen because you cannot live without the real american vote...

rise above your ignorant beliefs...and let

hbcu.educate u. and give u. some real wordz...

or be a bumblclyde suckin on the sugar cane and not allowing some purges...

to raise your kli tour bus.

rise above it...dont prove to bee an idiot.

don't act like a "pale-flu gidget".

what do you say andrew...

curve it...boo.

and DO IT TODAY, make it SO!!!!

px.o.rsta.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on February 10, 2005, 01:36:56 AM
Wow that was a harsh statement. Personally I don't live in the past but I will not disrespect my ancestors by forgetting the trials and tribulations they experienced. Of course it would be easy for someone like yourself to say "move on"  or “get over it”since your people weren't taken from their homes, raped, beaten, and forced into captivity for over 400 years. Hmph.

You can remember them.  You're remembering them in the thread about Black history month.  You're remembering them by doing better and going to law school, carrying out a dream that many of them did not have the chance to fulfill.  I think you do a disservice when you have such a xenophobic attitude towards white people.  No one alive in this country has slaves or knows anyone that had slaves.  I just think it's stupid to hold slavery over the heads of people that are living now.  We had no authority over slavery, did not chooose to institute it, and also had no hand in ending it.  I would hope we could move on to other issues.


hey fuchead...note your use of the word "WE"..."WELL, shucks, aye guess aye am just wondering why you did not we-weee on your panties...hope not...aye am sure your female stalk just lets itself wander...err..aye mean wonder...mr.wee wee...aye hoped, mr. wee wee..we could have moved on to other issues but aye guess u like peeing on your wee little self...aww shuchs..


u.r. sooooo... caught like a fuching rat.


idiot.



px.o.rsta
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: jaxon on February 10, 2005, 05:41:15 AM
penis2penis
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 10, 2005, 09:55:52 AM
so....why don't you all ever post on blsd?
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: BIG H2001 on February 10, 2005, 03:13:00 PM
so....why don't you all ever post on blsd?

I don't think HBCU would welcome me, as evidenced by his admission of hating white people.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 10, 2005, 03:24:35 PM
so....why don't you all ever post on blsd?

I don't think HBCU would welcome me, as evidenced by his admission of hating white people.

it's not HBCU's thread..and he doesn't hate white people..he wouldn't antagonise you for simply posting there.. I'm just asking because of the fact that a lot of people seem to be in an uproar about the existance of this thread, yet they don't seem interested in being a part of it.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: BIG H2001 on February 10, 2005, 03:29:29 PM
"Oh yeah...and I don't like white people either. But, does this mean that I can't be a mod?"

I guess he's not exactly fond of white people though.  If he became a mod that might discourage others from participating there if they knew that the moderator of the thread had an antagonistic attitude.  Either way, I'm not in opposition to him becoming a moderator.  He started the thread and it undoubtedly a resource for many people, I just wish that he would tone down the remarks.  They don't make him any better than any other person who makes racist statements.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: Dominique on February 10, 2005, 04:33:56 PM
I wanted to throw my hat in the mix here mostly because I'm very curious to see where this goes and I want to have it on my reply list.  I also think it's a real shame that someone would say they hate white people because they do racist things.  Logically speaking, it just doesn't make sense.  Personally I'm fascinated by race relations in this country.  It is certainly naive to think that slavery does not still impact us, so I understand where this is coming from.  But it also naive to think that just because someone is white their family must have owned slaves.  I'm white and my family never owned slaves. 
I understand wanting to stay in touch with your heritage but I hope that some day we can learn to remain true to the past while learning from it not to remain racist forever.  We should always keep the past in mind, but you don't have to define the future by it.  You may be missing out on something. 
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 10, 2005, 04:53:41 PM
Personally I think that the topic should either be in a new thread (seeing as this thread wasn't originally intended for this purpose). I don't believe that african americans are racist. I believe that some of us have some predjudices based on our history however. There is a difference between the two.

prejudice 1 : injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights; especially : detriment to one's legal rights or claims
2 a (1) : preconceived judgment or opinion (2) : an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b : an instance of such judgment or opinion c : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics

racist  a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TUNA on February 10, 2005, 06:40:05 PM
Personally I think that the topic should either be in a new thread (seeing as this thread wasn't originally intended for this purpose). I don't believe that african americans are racist. I believe that some of us have some predjudices based on our history however. There is a difference between the two.

prejudice 1 : injury or damage resulting from some judgment or action of another in disregard of one's rights; especially : detriment to one's legal rights or claims
2 a (1) : preconceived judgment or opinion (2) : an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b : an instance of such judgment or opinion c : an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics

racist  a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

LOL-YOU DELETED PART OF THAT DEFINITION OF RACISM TO SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT. Here is the WHOLE, UNALTERED DEFINITION:

(also, you manipulated the definition: "racist" is not "a belief that..." You meant "racism," as the CORRECT definition shows). www.dictionary.com

rac•ism     ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (rszm)
n.
1.The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race. 

Obviously HBCU does this. 'I don't like white people' seems to fit the bill. Disliking an individual because of their race is racism as per the second part of the definition you quoted from. There is NO DIFFERENCE than saying I don't like Person X because he/she is black.

Also, you state “I believe that some of us have some predjudices based on our history however.” Well, prejudice is synonymous with racism, pursuant to part 2 of the definition that you cite. Two implications- first, that you cited only the part helpful to your claim while concealing what is equally relevant, thereby perpetuating intellectual dishonesty. Second, you concede that blacks can be prejudiced, and prejudice is an element of racism, as per your own definition. By your own claim you are capable (and concede to engage in) racism.

Also:

racism

n 1: the prejudice that members of one race are intrinsically superior to members of other races
2: discriminatory or abusive behavior towards members of another race [syn: racialism, racial discrimination]

Two implications. First, prejudice is an element of racism, as stated above. You concede to being prejudiced- you thereby bind yourself to racism, or at least to the very same thinking that supports racism.

Second, part two of the definition also applies. 'I don't like whites' seems like abusive behavior directed at a race. Or, if it's not, then neither is saying 'I don't like blacks.' You cannot have it both ways so you might attempt to feign consistency. Racism is either bad or it’s not, you cannot have it both ways. Racist blacks are in no position of moral superiority over racist whites.

In addition:

big•ot    ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (bgt)
n.
One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

Partial to race? I’d say that describes you and HBCU pretty well.

In sum, I advise the following:

1. Do not bastardize definitions and contort things to fit your agenda. This is dishonest and erodes any credibility you might have retained. You should have learned about this in undergrad. It’s called “academic dishonesty.” I’ve never seen a strawman argument pulled out of a definition before.

2. Either condemn racism AND prejudice, or don't. But if you don't, you have no right to ever complain when you're on the losing side of it. Either racism AND prejudice are bad, or they're not. I maintain that they are BOTH bad, even assuming that you had articulated a relevant implication from any distinction between the two (which you did not). Also, EVEN IF your distinction is relevant, the two are still bound up together, as per the definitions I cite above. This means that if you’re prejudiced against/for a race (which you concede) you are also a definitional racist.

3. Hypocrisy makes you look bad, so you might attempt to fix that. Your position is akin to saying, "I hate racism, but only if it's against me." That is a disgusting position and you owe it to yourself to re-examine the reasons causing you to adopt such a view. Hatred is ugly, no matter who spews it.

4. If you want to debate this, please make coherent arguments. I expect you to dismiss this post with something similar to "shut up whitey" or "blacks cannot ever be racist, only whites are." Please surprise me with something more compelling. Also, please attempt to be responsive to my arguments. Or, you can simply forfeit your untenable positions.

PWN3D.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: HBCU.EDU on February 10, 2005, 07:01:43 PM
You crackas are so stupid. I think you need to bring this discussion to BLSD and stop taking up space for votes. What, you guys are too scccarrrred to come to the hood? I'm just fucing around when I call yall names. I'm black and I can get away with it. There is a double standard so you just have to take it up the ass when I talk like that. If you were on blsd you would know that I just say a lot of sh*t to watch stupid white boys like TUNA, and that other punk get upset. Stop being a female dog. Come to blsd. I'm definitely going to call you names. just make sure that you don't call me any names and we will be fine. Hey, i've got white frineds! :-\

I dind't know white people are so sensitive. Yall owned slaves, and you killed all the native americans and you still have feelings? jeeez.

BLSD belongs to me! I created the thread, and I set the #@!*#ing rules. Period.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: HBCU.EDU on February 10, 2005, 07:11:08 PM
Wow, people can be so lame.  Y'all don't seriously believe HBCU hates white people, do you?  Most folks with a sense of humor could tell that what he's saying is somewhat tongue-in-cheek.  The thing is, white folks tend to get uncomfortable when minorities talk about race, so things that should be taken in a lighthearted manner get blown out of proportion.  A lot of my white friends detest black comedy for this very reason - they think it serves to exacerbate racial divisions.  I would argue that it makes them feel uncomfortable to realize that black folks have opinions about white people - racial comedy reclaims a sense of agency among black people.  Instead of being acted upon (being discriminated against) we are actors (have the capacity to discriminate.)  While discrimination is never good, the White liberal "let's save the black people" mentality is turned on its head by the comedy.

Also, this kind of comedy can open up the dialogue.  Race relations in the US still suck because we don't talk about it anymore.  I'm all for being PC, but the negative fallout of political correctness is that folks are so worried about saying something taboo that things are brushed under the carpet.  HBC is really good at saying inflammatory things but I assumed people would get it!

Yeah! what Mobell said!!  Thanks for articulating that *&^% for me. I see why you got a full reeze to columbia. take that *&^% and @#!* harvard. I guess they watch chris rock and get upset when he talks about white people, huh? LOL they are so f-ing lame. 
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 10, 2005, 07:14:02 PM
Actually Starkist.....I didn't delete anything...the definition didn't come from dictionary.com


I haven't conceded to engaging in racism nor have I stated that prejudice or racism are justifiable. I simply said the two words have different meanings. You can't compare any of my postings to any of the negative racist postings on this board. I haven't said anything against anyone of any ethnic background.

The reality is that there are still inequalities between black and whites because of the legacy of slavery and segregation as well as present day racial discrimination. Access to everything from housing, to healthcare to education depends on possession of money. Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans on average have less money than whites. Blacks have lived and died in poverty. 

At the end of the day minorities are in a position where we have to overcome in order to get ahead.

You will NEVER have to worry about being denied a position based on the color of your skin.

You will NEVER have to worry about whether or not you're considered an excellent attorney based on the color of your skin.

You will NEVER have to worry about your classmates treating you as if you didn't belong because they believe (regardless of the fact that there's no truth to it) that you attend the same  prodominently  white institution that they attend because of affirmative action

You have no worries or stumbling blocks to overcome on the basis of being white.

There's no need to gripe over someone wanting to become a moderator over a thread that you don't even post on? That makes no sense whatsoever.

Again, why don't you bring this discussion to BLSD? What are you afraid of ?
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: HBCU.EDU on February 10, 2005, 07:17:10 PM
TUNA..BIG...stop being a female dog and post to BLSD.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: mivida2k on February 10, 2005, 10:15:34 PM
You really are a bitter guy.  I hope you go to Howard  so that you won't be forced to interact with any white people in law school.  Selfish and stupid.

What do you gain by living in the past?

Also, if you had a little historical perspective you would know that the percentage of families owning slaves was actually very low in many states and that not all white people came to America during the first wave of immigration. 

This country has years before it will heal.  Folks are still benefiting from slavery.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on February 11, 2005, 01:53:59 AM
let us keep up to date...

is hbcu a moderator?...aye will check in from time to time to see..

let me make one point clear....the {hits} on blsd are enough to gather at leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaass sssssssssssssssst.

a moderator...so please, if you can find it in your heart...


CONCEDE!


andrew...and peace and kind and general grievious will be watching.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on February 11, 2005, 02:41:38 AM
as far as many of us are concerned your agreement is a formality.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 11, 2005, 10:40:26 AM
*crickets*
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TUNA on February 11, 2005, 11:56:05 AM
Re:*crickets*

The last five posts were incoherent and do not appear to have been authored by literate people. It's really not shocking that there aren't many replies.

HTH
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: HBCU.EDU on February 11, 2005, 12:13:56 PM
Re:*crickets*

The last five posts were incoherent and do not appear to have been authored by literate people. It's really not shocking that there aren't many replies.

HTH

stop being a female private part and post to blsd tuna.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 11, 2005, 12:22:49 PM
Re:*crickets*

The last five posts were incoherent and do not appear to have been authored by literate people. It's really not shocking that there aren't many replies.

HTH

stop being a female private part and post to blsd tuna.

you know that for whatever reason he's afraid to do that..
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: Regal_Muse on February 11, 2005, 12:43:40 PM
the whtie guy in his avatar is scaring me...   :'(
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 11, 2005, 04:08:32 PM
the whtie guy in his avatar is scaring me...   :'(

LOL...he needs to just go head and get that Starkist Tuna mascot. I guess it's all the same
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: ! B L U E WAR R I O R..! on February 14, 2005, 01:44:59 AM
hbcu...are you going to be a moderator or not?

Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: HBCU.EDU on February 14, 2005, 03:36:29 PM
hbcu...are you going to be a moderator or not?



I was told by Andrew that I was going to be a mod. However, I do no have mod powers at this point. I will def. contact him again and see what the deal is.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: Andrew on February 14, 2005, 06:06:03 PM
I've been short on time lately.  Sorry things like this have taken so long.  HBCU is now the moderator of the BLSD.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: blk_reign on February 14, 2005, 06:10:57 PM
I've been short on time lately.  Sorry things like this have taken so long.  HBCU is now the moderator of the BLSD.

Yes indeed... People did all of that complaining against him for nothing!!!! Congrats HBCU.EDU
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: mivida2k on February 14, 2005, 06:24:03 PM
Great.
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: lil_token on February 14, 2005, 08:52:48 PM
I've been short on time lately.  Sorry things like this have taken so long.  HBCU is now the moderator of the BLSD.
Thanks, Andrew!

All hail the great HBCU!
Title: Re: Moderator for BLSD
Post by: TrojanChispas on February 15, 2005, 10:40:21 AM
thanks andrew!