Law School Discussion

October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath

Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #50 on: October 02, 2004, 11:58:09 AM »
True...if it had kept that tone of difficulty, I would have been pretty discouraged.  For now, I just feel nervous, and hope that I luck out on some of the ones I was unsure of. 

TDPookie1

  • *****
  • 7929
  • the sugar cane is back!
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #51 on: October 02, 2004, 11:58:22 AM »
Today, my test had 3 sets of arguments, so one of those was my experimental.  The 1st set of arg. was the experimental, due to degree of difficulty and the fact that two more came after that.  I had a bit of an issue with the logic games, specifically the 3rd and 4th one.  For some reason, I just couldn't seem to get them.  I probably only got 2 or so right on each of 3 and 4...unbelievable.  RC didn't bother me all that much, it actually seemed to be the part where I did best at.  My third set of arguments (would be your 2nd, right?) I found to be pretty hard...rather complicated.  December might be in my future, pending results.

in the first three sections, not the first of three identical sections.  and you can't pick out experimental based on difficulty level.  but i see you already figured out that section 2 was experimental.  :)

Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #52 on: October 02, 2004, 11:59:33 AM »
How the hell do you people remember what letters you chose?!?!?


Seriously....someone was asking me a question about which letter I chose for "19" or something after the test...I'm thinking, "Wow, I don't remember anything."  I think I just don't dwell on questions, or, I got so many wrong I stopped caring.  Who knows.

calibos11

Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #53 on: October 02, 2004, 11:59:44 AM »
btw, everyone thinks the games were easy and the rc was tough, but i thought it was the opposite.
Quote
Quote

I agree 100%.  LG were tough for me.  Mostly complex grouping-linear combos; I guessed on a lot of those! :(

maxse

  • ****
  • 160
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #54 on: October 02, 2004, 11:59:52 AM »
because when I was bubbling in, I noticed that only 2 where Ds which surprised me, thats why I remember it. Because I also thought those first 10 questions where kinda heard, and the one towards the end where easier. Which is completely opposite from the preptests that I took.

mememe

  • ****
  • 123
    • View Profile
Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #55 on: October 02, 2004, 12:00:13 PM »
With how much certainty can you guys predict your score from today?  

sarendipity

  • ****
  • 165
  • My law school roommate
    • View Profile
Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #56 on: October 02, 2004, 12:00:47 PM »
yep- mememe- I got alot of d's it seems on some section. Cant remember if it was LR though. it's all a blur now  :P

Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #57 on: October 02, 2004, 12:01:53 PM »
question: I had 2 games. Section 2 and 5.

Section 5 games included parking lot, and dogs...so my section 5 games was NOT experimental, since these are the games everyone had?

Thanks

TDPookie1

  • *****
  • 7929
  • the sugar cane is back!
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #58 on: October 02, 2004, 12:02:25 PM »
that's correct, eb.

JGC

Re: October 2004 LSAT: the aftermath
« Reply #59 on: October 02, 2004, 12:03:06 PM »
Does anyone remember the question on the 3rd subsection of LG on archaeologists, about the number of sites for a particular archaeologist?  I put three, since my first answer for that section had him in three sites--thought that could have been wrong too.