wouldn't it be an interesting ploy for US News to fake out those of us trying to get some sort of early beat on it and this was all just fake?
Quote from: Johnny Stuffs His Mouth on March 27, 2007, 03:18:59 PMQuote from: Hank Rearden on March 27, 2007, 03:17:35 PMHaven't read most of this thread, but NYU and Penn continue to be overrated IMO. Not that I disagree, but I'll ask the same question I asked Sooner: whose ratings should we go by?What do you mean? I just meant they were overrated by USNews.
Quote from: Hank Rearden on March 27, 2007, 03:17:35 PMHaven't read most of this thread, but NYU and Penn continue to be overrated IMO. Not that I disagree, but I'll ask the same question I asked Sooner: whose ratings should we go by?
Haven't read most of this thread, but NYU and Penn continue to be overrated IMO.
Sigur -- how exactly would overenrollment impact rankings -- would it affect yield?
iscored, any chance that this is an incredibly, incredibly elaborate ruse designed to teach us all a lesson: namely that we put far too much stock into one magazine's rankings, and that our decisions should be based on personal criteria?
Quote from: WeeSqueak on March 27, 2007, 03:23:03 PMSigur -- how exactly would overenrollment impact rankings -- would it affect yield?Well, off the top of my head it would probably affect the spending/student, but that's not a very significant number in the calculation, so I'm just talking out of my ass.
Quote from: Sigur on March 27, 2007, 03:24:30 PMQuote from: WeeSqueak on March 27, 2007, 03:23:03 PMSigur -- how exactly would overenrollment impact rankings -- would it affect yield?Well, off the top of my head it would probably affect the spending/student, but that's not a very significant number in the calculation, so I'm just talking out of my ass. looks like they do use the student/teacher ratio as a major factor
Quote from: Hank Rearden on March 27, 2007, 03:21:52 PMQuote from: Johnny Stuffs His Mouth on March 27, 2007, 03:18:59 PMQuote from: Hank Rearden on March 27, 2007, 03:17:35 PMHaven't read most of this thread, but NYU and Penn continue to be overrated IMO. Not that I disagree, but I'll ask the same question I asked Sooner: whose ratings should we go by?What do you mean? I just meant they were overrated by USNews. By overrated, I assumed you meant there was some standard against which US News overrated them (Penn couldn't be overrated unless it really, truly belonged somewhere else: how do you determine that?).
The appropriateness of Perpetua would probably depend on the tone of the writing. When I used it, I (half playfully) thought the extra space made the words sort of resonate.
Quote from: Johnny Stuffs His Mouth on March 27, 2007, 03:23:08 PMiscored, any chance that this is an incredibly, incredibly elaborate ruse designed to teach us all a lesson: namely that we put far too much stock into one magazine's rankings, and that our decisions should be based on personal criteria?i only wish it were. It'd involve lots of fake double accounts that i've been posting under with different personalities for the past few months to confirm my little fake out. And in the end, people would all come together and realize that only the data that they personally really care about should be used for their decision (whether it be academic reputation, salary after graduation, 75th percentile LSAT score, location, etc).