Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)  (Read 16607 times)

stc34

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 610
    • View Profile
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #40 on: July 19, 2006, 09:50:38 PM »
I would definately apply to some schools this cycle.  A 165 looks a lot better than a 160.  Depending on your GPA you could get into many schools in the 15-25 range and maybe even a T14. 


Well my GPA is only a 3.15.  What do you think I should shoot for?

spud1987

  • Guest
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #41 on: July 19, 2006, 10:10:31 PM »
I would definately apply to some schools this cycle.  A 165 looks a lot better than a 160.  Depending on your GPA you could get into many schools in the 15-25 range and maybe even a T14. 


Well my GPA is only a 3.15.  What do you think I should shoot for?

I would check lawschoolnumbers.com, thats probably the best resource.  I still think you would have a good shot at many schools ranked 25-50.

paigeroo

  • Guest
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #42 on: July 20, 2006, 04:53:28 PM »
Can someone please condense this list into a coherent one page updated doc?  I want to help and add some schools that I've talked to but its just a pain in the a** to look at the posts to see who has talked to whom. 

spud1987

  • Guest
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #43 on: July 20, 2006, 05:02:44 PM »
Can someone please condense this list into a coherent one page updated doc?  I want to help and add some schools that I've talked to but its just a pain in the a** to look at the posts to see who has talked to whom. 

I'm not too sure what you're talking about, the original post has a list of the top 100 schools and info on the ones we know about.

paigeroo

  • Guest
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #44 on: July 20, 2006, 05:19:08 PM »
Can someone please condense this list into a coherent one page updated doc?  I want to help and add some schools that I've talked to but its just a pain in the a** to look at the posts to see who has talked to whom. 

I'm not too sure what you're talking about, the original post has a list of the top 100 schools and info on the ones we know about.

Oh so you really are missing all of those schools with the question marks?

spud1987

  • Guest
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #45 on: July 20, 2006, 05:24:40 PM »
Can someone please condense this list into a coherent one page updated doc?  I want to help and add some schools that I've talked to but its just a pain in the a** to look at the posts to see who has talked to whom. 

I'm not too sure what you're talking about, the original post has a list of the top 100 schools and info on the ones we know about.

Oh so you really are missing all of those schools with the question marks?

Ya, I have been constantly updating it as people post information.

paigeroo

  • Guest
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #46 on: July 20, 2006, 07:47:33 PM »
Can someone please condense this list into a coherent one page updated doc?  I want to help and add some schools that I've talked to but its just a pain in the a** to look at the posts to see who has talked to whom. 

I'm not too sure what you're talking about, the original post has a list of the top 100 schools and info on the ones we know about.

Oh so you really are missing all of those schools with the question marks?

Ya, I have been constantly updating it as people post information.

Oh well in that case:

1. Notre Dame is taking the highest LSAT hands down
2. Boston College was a little on the vague side but said the following:
We REPORT the highest lsat score to the ABA, however, we still consider all
3. BYU- They are taking the higher score
4. University of Illinois is taking the higher score

Almost everyone said that if you have a huge discrepancy it would be wise to add a short addendum. 

Also to the OP: might be cool to bold all of the ones that are still averaging since it seems to be in the minority.

This is a good resource for people.   :)

paigeroo

  • Guest
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #47 on: July 20, 2006, 07:58:21 PM »
Oh, and as an aside- St. Louis University has always taken the higher lsat score regardless.

spud1987

  • Guest
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #48 on: July 20, 2006, 08:18:09 PM »
Thanks paigeroo for the info and advise.   :)

paigeroo

  • Guest
Re: LSAT Policies for 2006-07 Cycle (due to change in ABA policy)
« Reply #49 on: July 20, 2006, 08:21:44 PM »
Thanks paigeroo for the info and advise.   :)

Glad to help such a altrustic cause  ;)